Not bashing Emerson, but comparing them to a Sebenza just doesn't work
:
It sure works for me.... The main thing exhibited in your posts to this thread is your obloquy regarding another's use,
as well as appreciation, of a knife.
......How often do you hear people complain about QC from CRK? How about QC from Emerson
Emerson is a "tactical" (if you will) whereas CRK's are more "gentlemanly" (if you will).
Adding now, I am one who is rooted since youth in fixed blade knives for survival in extreme conditions. Gentleman's folders don't fill the bill in those situations a lot of times. I didn't get into folders until much later.
I've owned several of both, Emersons and CR's. Never run into a QC problem with either--although, as you say, I've read posts here from those who have.
Both brands. IMO there is more rationalizing it away as OK for the 'gentleman's" knife, perhaps because someone paid far more than what it's really worth not only in use, but within their own spectrum of how it will ever BE used--a most conspicuous consideration, rarely admitted to.
I see in other posts here you've chopped up bags of ice with a SOG. Ever done it a half-mile out on lake ice above timberline at 3am with no moon in 20-below to get to the fish on time, when your fancyknife steel with its nuclear heat-treat would risk fracture? Perhaps.
I've never been aroused by the term "gentlemanly;" especially since about the '70's. Maybe I'm just cut a little rougher--I'd have never been able to handle being stuck in an office for an entire career either. So? Just a difference between you and me. I don't order multi-languaged styles of coffee and I always decline sprinkles too. Is the "half-caf decaf, double machi-caramelo marshmallow, fat, wet, with Nubian virgin sprinkles" worth thrice as much or more than plain black? A lot of people believe it is, citing the ingredients being added. Again, so?
CRK uses better steel as well as a more consistent heat treat. Is a CRK worth twice the price of an Emerson. IMO, yes. However, I believe both brands are overpriced.
I've noticed over time that most of your justifications regarding knife quality, as well as your two descriptives above, are quantifiable really only as numbers and phrases that, real world, are good only for reading on paper.
There are more things that go into not only the dependability of a knife, but the
appreciation of one as well. I'm one of those guys for whom a Sebenza does absolutely zero. I've given my descriptive terms and reasons for same in these pages enough...for now. And let me proudly add I am not one who obsesses over steel type, Rockwell numbers and whose posts said negative things about specific brands of knives on BladeForums. I do know what constitutes a good knife for
my uses, however.
I've never understood Emerson knives. Almost every thing about them I don't like. I don't like the wave, recurves, chisel grind, the logo slathered all over the blade, and the whole fast draw/tacticalness. I owned a Kershaw Emerson briefly. Hated it. I don't want my knife to open everytime I go to pull it out or have to consciously think about manipulating the knife so it doesn't open when I pull it out. I guess working in an office lessens my desire for getting all tactical.
I realize you don't understand the appeal of Emerson knives. I do. Many people DON'T want the features you specify above. So they buy another knife. You and I are different in some of our knife preferences. Once again, so?
BTW, a Kershaw Emerson is a Kershaw. Perhaps being an office worker DOES influence your priorities in a folder. It's understandable. And btw.... most Emerson owners could teach you to properly wave or not wave upon withdrawal in under an hour had you ever been interested.
Finally, further scrutiny of your thread posts reveals that you're almost my size. As to a couple of your other subtle
brags--I know REAL ones. We don't do that.
I'll continue to read your posts here. Usually I've found them interesting and informative. Just a little taken aback at some of your rants in this thread....