OK, I'll be the first one to put/stick my neck out, and voice my opinions......
I am a advocate of edge quenching. It allows me to have a greater degree of control as to how the finished blade with perform. By varying the quench depth, I can control the amount of flex and toughness the blade with exhibit. (This type of quench is the one I use on "straight" steel blades).
I utilize the full quenching method for my damascus blades, if for no other reason than to ensure the patterns are smooth and even in the finished product. The flexibility and toughness aspect for damascus blades are handled through the tempering cycles. But even paying close attention to tempering will not give as much control as the edge quenching method.
At one time I advocated the soft back drawing method......but not any more. IF done correctly it will produce a blade that will pass all the ABS cutting/bending tests, but after considerable research, I've found that most people are in too big of a hurry to perform it correctly. Most folks want to hurry the soft back draw process along, and in doing so only manage to temper a thin layer on the exterior of the blade......some do greater damage by not allowing the blade to cool naturally.....they take a blade that has a nice blue back on it, and cool it in water! BAD MOVE! Even though this blade may be able to flex to 90 degrees once, it will quickly fail due to the grain structure within, that was induced by the water cooling. To be done correctly, the soft back draw should be done with the edge of the blade in water or oil, and the spine of a 3-4" bladed hunter should take 20-40 mins to reach the "spring" color. This all goes back to Time/Temp, for which there is no shortcut. Thermal cycles will make or break a blade......if it takes 2-3 hours of soaking to properly temper a blade in an oven, then how can 5-10 mins of intense heat accomplish the same thing?
There has, and always will be controversy over the triple quench. But I use it, and belive it is the best method for getting the most out of 5160 and 52100. Although there are many theories out there as to why it works, I'll not explore those here, I'll only say that it works for me, and I will continue using it until I find something better.