black mamba
Gold Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 23,601
Appreciate the good info, Mike. Thanks as always!
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Yep, makes sense to me. They've got to be substantially similar in hardness or the blade will wear the spring badly over time.
Blades and backsprings are made from the same steel and heat treated to the same Rc (Rockwell) hardness for most production and custom folders.
I never knew this. I am guessing this is for issues of wear if the spring were not of the same steel and Rc?
With SS blades, they use 410, 420, or 420HC backsprings depending on the thickness. With 1095, they use 1095 backsprings. Both hardened to around 45-47.
They anneal the tang of the blade to about the same as the backspring.
They grab a handful (10 or so) from each batch (100+) that comes back from heat treat and hammer test them.
I never knew this. I am guessing this is for issues of wear if the spring were not of the same steel and Rc?
Double post.
My two cents worth.
Blades and backsprings are made from the same steel and heat treated to the same Rc (Rockwell) hardness for most production and custom folders.
Don't know if there's really much truth in that, to justify a generalization. Prominent exceptions among production makers:
Queen's D2 folders have 420HC backsprings (they confirmed this to me via email, when I asked).
Case's CV knives have stainless (420HC) springs.
At least some of the older Camillus-made Buck 300-series knives had 440A blades and carbon steel springs (I have a 307 like this, with darkly patinated springs).
These are only the ones I'm immediately aware of; I'm assuming there are more, if one were inclined to dig further. I'd bet a lot of the knives using the same steel for both (though at different RC, as pointed out) are coincidental, especially if the blades happen to be in 420HC or 1095.
David