- Joined
- Jan 12, 2011
- Messages
- 5,064
I should have been clearer. My understanding was that Rubicon's first response indicated the list I gave in the original post was in the designer/maker's scope of intended use for the knife. When I said "appropriate uses" in the subsequent posts, I should have said "intended uses" or "uses it's designed for".
Honestly, This is like having my X-Wife on the Forum. You ask a question and then the responses become the conversation spinning and analyzing the meanings.
This is a Hinderer sub-forum to a knife forum.
This is supposed to be enjoyable.
We like knives (HERE) it happens to be Hinderer Knives and associated Hinderer equipment.
"We" didn't ask for Your input or reviews of the knives we already like.
I already said, what you review and test is your business - there is a sub-forum for that.
As for my posts, If you have a question about what I meant - Ask.
I'm getting tired of reading peoples impressions of what I said - it's irritating.