Not that I will actually be able to make it all the way to Atlanta, but in general, your input on certain things has really grabbed my attention, and would probably play very well at Blade.
The concept of matching tools and steels; ie; simple steel for simple tools. I learned a lot listening to the heat treating lecture you gave at Ashokan '06, where you described Decalescence, and how to watch it. As well as why this method is best used for the simpler steels available to knifemakers. This gets into carbides and how to manipulate them, but for a lot of us, that's a topic for a different lecture. The concept of matching the tools at hand to the steel choice in order to make the most of both really struck me as a practical, useable, common sense sort of thing that has probably been overlooked more often than not, to the detriment and frustration of many.
A basic description of the TTT graph, what each region means, related to layperson terms is likely a decent jumping off point for another topic I personally find fascinating, compelling, and worth looking more into. That being the idea that from a pure performance perspective, properly made and tempered martensite will likely outperform it's equivilant hardness in other microstructures.
I would, of course, also like to see a discussion on hardening lines, how they get to be so pretty, and a compare / contrast between through hardening and differential hardening, the pro's and con's of each method, etc.
The demo you did (again at Ashokan '06) with the interrupted quench was a real eye popper for a lot of people. Dropping that freshly hardened blade on concrete, there were more than one sharp breaths in anticipation of the break that didn't happen.
Then, of course, there's the bendy testy thing. Your article about the merits and pitfalls of the ABS performace test, and how people can inadvertantly misinterpret it was very well worded, convincing, and makes a great lead up to a repeat of the 360* bend test, if you're feeling theatrical.
Depending on the level of the audience, many of the questions Nathan brought up would, of course be fascinating, but from a practical standpoint, I don't think of things like cryogenics and the differences between wootz and pattern welded steels to be very much connected with the words "common sense metallurgical approach". Sure, once someone gets a real solid handle on the basics, things like cryo and marquenching can help eek out those last few bits of performace left in the steel, but there's a lot of guys out there like me who are still struggling with the basics.
Finally, (like you havn't done this enough already!) a basic bibliography of reference materials, and how to get them at a reasonable price would likely be very welcome to all.
You see, this is why you've got to get that book organized. That way, you can give a lecture straight out of a chapter devoted to the topic at hand, and it makes a great plug for book sales!