rifon2 said:
Still, I look forward to any information on what inspired this design
with an open mind.
To provide this information, I will now post the response from
the owner of Boker.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Being currently in the US, I was made aware of the very strong opposition being currently published in the various internet discussion groups.
Here is the comment of the man who is at the end responsible for any activity of the Boker groups, and that includes the design of the Boker Plus
knives.
Up to today we are enjoying a very positive recognition for our work within the knife industry. High quality in workmanship paired with innovative designs, locking mechanisms and introduction of new materials for blade and handle helped us achieve this most valuable position.
Three examples:
1. Back in 1979, Boker was the first offering Damascus steel blades in folders.
2. The Speedlock design in the 90's turned loose a lot of copies os aluminum handle designs with kraton inserts. I remember a knockoff being so exact that we could exchange blades and both knives would operate beautifully as an automatic.
3. This year we introduced with SubCom, Turbine and Reality Based Blade.
ALL authentic Boker designs which might inspire competition again.
The history of the 3 Boker Plus designs go back to the special demand of AAFES. They wanted to offer to their soldiers a knife product not being available on the knife market in terms of design, materials for blade and handle, locking mechanism, all over finish and price.
I have to agree with our critics that the result is getting us very close to the Strider handle design. The facts that our knives are different in size, don't show the recessed fingergrooves and that the grip grooves are running around the complete handle make them different- however not different enough. The versatile way of having our clip design fixed on to the handle and the completely different blade design to Strider made us agree to what this extremely valuable knife customer really wanted us to produce.
Let's discuss the blade design. Here I take a different stand against the critics saying this is a cheap copy of CRKT's M16.
Boker Germany is the importer and distributor of CRKT in Germany and Austria for a number of years. When Columbia came out with their M16 series and the Tanto shape blade, Boker was already on the market with our H&K knives and the Superliner, the award winner as Overall-Knife-Of-The-Year at the Blade Show 1997. Both series were offered with drop point and Tanto blade shapes. It never donned on me to call the M16 a cheap copy of our designs. The tanto is an historically related Japanese blade shape, freely available to all knifemakers. The differences between the Tanto's of Benchmade, Cold Steel, CRKT, Boker and others are minor compared to the unique contour and it's four typical grinding lines. Rod Bremmer, president of CRKT, has seen the Boker PLus knives both at SHOT and IWA in Nuernberg.
We had many things to discuss. The blade shape was not part of it.
To cut a long story short:
1. I take the blame to have produced a handle design that is similar to the Strider.
2. All other features of the knives, and that includes the blade, and the fixed blade, make this Boker Plus line a different enough product to stand on its own.
3. I learned out of this discussion and will do my bestnot to get Boker even near to be a suspect of copying designs from others.
Ernst Felix,
President, Boker