- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
- Messages
- 3,194
I love the fact that some people actually think the holes are what adds the most value to Tom's knives. I suppose those same people look at a talon hole in a Busse and figure that's where the real value in Busse knives lies.
Oh well. What are you going to do . . .
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...o-knives-so-expensive?p=13259531#post13259531
![]()
Hey bld522, I'm not sure that's fair comment to the detractors here. We are not discussing the value of a Tom Mayo knife, we are talking about a Chris Reeve knife that Mayo drilled holes in. In the case of a Mayo knife, the holes are part of his vision, and the value is attached to the entire Mayo knife based on you liking the Mayo design and workmanship.
In the case of this thread, we are having a pretty honest and respectful discussion of whether Mayo holes add or detract value from a Chris Reeve product, not a Mayo product.
I know there's a lot of talk of some custom tuning to the Sebenzas by Mayo, but let's face it, other than drilling the slab holes, and the changes to the blade (sharpening and polished flats?), what can you really do to a Sebenza? The Sebenza is a very, very simple mechanism. He could polish the washers, but the pivot itself cannot be sanded or reduced in size without introducing blade play. In the case of the lock face, I don't want Mayo, Loveless, Gayle Bradley, Jim Bowie or even Jesus adjusting that......

Anyways, my best guess, and personal opinion, is that taking a mint Large Regular, in 2015, and sending it to Tom Mayo to have a 'Minute of Angle' pattern drilled in the slabs instantly devalues that knife by hundreds of dollars. I believe collectors hold pristeen examples of the older CRK work in higher regard than the simple drill-hole mods done by Mayo. I personally would not send any CRK regular to him to have it perforated to add monetary value. It wouldn't from what I see.
Interesting discussion everyone! Nice to have something to chat about.