Oh, I'm the same way. But when opinions are based on inexperience, and repeating what someone else might have said because it sounded good, and without any further personal investigation, it's hard to remain polite sometimes. Like the 'surgical steel' folks, their mind is made up. They usually don't know anything about knives other than(maybe) how to use one, and as long as it cuts, and the name is catchy, they're in hog heaven.
But I didn't come here to argue or gripe, tho it might seem otherwise at times, just to point out that there are too many variables in the equation to make an empirical statement to the effect that alloy 'X' is the best thing that ever happened to the stock-removal cutlery world. Or that alloy 'Z' might be the best forging steel ever. But, they're likely NOT even similar alloys. So, which of those two is ultimate? And don't forget things like the user interface, and whether one is doing destructive or non-destructive testing. Also, the needs and expectations of the user will vary, so performance parameters are even harder to pin down, tho one has to remember that first and foremost, it needs to be able to cut stuff. Do you need a knife that will skin a humvee, or slice a tomato so thin you can read through it? Until we have a single knife that will do both of these without the need to resharpen, trying to suss the ultimate steel is a waste of time we can never get back. A fun, tho ultimately pointless (pun intended), exercise.
And yet I keep coming back...