There’s currently a used A2 folder for sale online (I’ll let you guess the site) for $1700: the knife originally retailed for $900 and has multiple scratches from the previous owner. I’ve seen probably half of the limited release Shiro Sigma’s for sale online, most at a substantial markup, and just got laughed at by someone for offering $80 bellow retail for a used HatiOn.
Obviously demand drives price. If the prices aren’t reasonable, they won’t sell. But as additional people look to sell and use these “inflated” prices as reference, the price is driven up, and remains there until the market corrects and the prices plummet, essentially having the inverse intended effect on the value of the item.
So the question is at what point does it become gouging and counter productive, negatively and impact fair market prices? Isn’t offering a fair price better in the long run, and good karma for both the seller and buyer who gets to enjoy a beautiful piece?
Tl;dr: markups are dumb.
Obviously demand drives price. If the prices aren’t reasonable, they won’t sell. But as additional people look to sell and use these “inflated” prices as reference, the price is driven up, and remains there until the market corrects and the prices plummet, essentially having the inverse intended effect on the value of the item.
So the question is at what point does it become gouging and counter productive, negatively and impact fair market prices? Isn’t offering a fair price better in the long run, and good karma for both the seller and buyer who gets to enjoy a beautiful piece?
Tl;dr: markups are dumb.