Giving credit where it is due, this thread is inspired by a post from Madpoet in the KF.
I have heard of BM Strykers after only a couple years or so being worn out from use. I've seen a BM Tsunami (belonging to a cop friend of mine) with slight blade play in all directions but otherwise going strong after years of almost daily use. Seen a CQC-7 approaching worn.
On the other hand, I've both owned and heard of others owning/using more traditional lockback and slipjoint folders for decades before wearing out...sometimes even still going strong after regular use.
Of course, any knife can and will wear out with enough use. But it just seems by observation that so many of the new, more expensive, high-tech one-handers may not have the longevity of the older-style knives.
I suppose only time will tell as to durability for daily use/carry for such knives as linerlocks and axis/rolling-type locks. No one has yet carried such knives for decades.
Perhaps it is extra-hard use/abuse the newer knives are being put to? Has anyone else made these observations?
Jim
I have heard of BM Strykers after only a couple years or so being worn out from use. I've seen a BM Tsunami (belonging to a cop friend of mine) with slight blade play in all directions but otherwise going strong after years of almost daily use. Seen a CQC-7 approaching worn.
On the other hand, I've both owned and heard of others owning/using more traditional lockback and slipjoint folders for decades before wearing out...sometimes even still going strong after regular use.
Of course, any knife can and will wear out with enough use. But it just seems by observation that so many of the new, more expensive, high-tech one-handers may not have the longevity of the older-style knives.
I suppose only time will tell as to durability for daily use/carry for such knives as linerlocks and axis/rolling-type locks. No one has yet carried such knives for decades.
Perhaps it is extra-hard use/abuse the newer knives are being put to? Has anyone else made these observations?
Jim