The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Not to you maybe. But I'd love to see it tested. Talk about the 800 pound gorilla in the living room . . .IMO the RAO is such a horrible, impractical design at such a ridiculous price that it wouldn't matter if it won in the first place.
That video test was of a Chinese clone as far as I can tell and some in the comments say that too.I have no doubt the RAO would pass the spine whack, overstrike, and weight hang tests, but I think the 4-MAX would still be snug and lock up properly in the end, while the RAO may potentially not. To make things more interesting, they could test 2 RAOs, one with the bolt installed and one without, and see what difference it would make. I know it's designed to be used with the bolt installed during hard use, but it would be interesting to see how it would do relying on the internal lock only. I welcome any tests CS wants to do, regardless of outcome. I know many see no value in their tests, but they are interesting to me. [emoji106]
[video=youtube;QiBtHGfgZLI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiBtHGfgZLI[/video]
I don't know enough about Extrema Ratio to tell. What's the evidence for that? I can see it being true, but I can also see bottominjured fanboys calling foul when their "real fixed blade" doesn't perform how they think it should. Not passing judgement, just asking if there's evidence either way.That video test was of a Chinese clone as far as I can tell and some in the comments say that too.
The 4 Max also has a slot for a pin, the same design feature as the RAO without the bungied-on-the-butt pin.Part of the lock per se, no, but an optional reinforcement for the lock that is part of the knife's design, yes. Given that it's part of the design, I think the knife should be tested as such (in its toughest potential state you might say). However, the pin/bolt not being an integral part of the lock is the reason I suggest testing it both ways. If the pin/bolt is lost, forgotten, etc. (like if someone didn't want the lanyard and pin hanging from the knife all the time, so they carried it separately), it'd be interesting to see how the lock would fare on it's own.
The 4 Max also has a slot for a pin, the same design feature as the RAO without the bungied-on-the-butt pin.
I don't have a link right now, and just started home, but I'll look. I believe Demko said so, but it might have been a general comment on his knives with the holes in the guard.I see the hole but where did you find it is designed for a pin to hold the blade open? Link?
I don't have a link right now, and just started home, but I'll look. I believe Demko said so, but it might have been a general comment on his knives with the holes in the guard.
The 4 Max also has a slot for a pin, the same design feature as the RAO without the bungied-on-the-butt pin.
For me a manually inserted external stop pin is not a part of the knifes lock.
If I look at the official definition of a machine or mechanism a screw in pin would easily fall within that.Absolutely agree, and that's what amuses me in the Sebenza / few other threads here.
Technically speaking, you can just drill a hole in any knife and claim that that's the "super strong, fixed-blade-like locking system".
Hole with an external pin you need to screw in manually is not a mechanism.
If I look at the official definition of a machine or mechanism a screw in pin would easily fall within that.
Crude mechanism for sure but still a mechanism.
More elegant would be if the pin would be spring loaded and jumps in automatically once the hole swings by but even then it would need some kind of manual release.