Where are going the Knives collection world? An ethical question.

The OP's mother tongue is not English, and he did a better job of posting the subtleties of his thoughts than I would in Italian....maybe cut him some slack?

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson

What thoughts do you think he meant to convey with words like ethical, honesty, truthfulness that were somehow just distorted by translation errors? Maybe one misplaced word . . . but all of those? :rolleyes:

I think the thrust of his post was well captured by Roger. And his reply to Roger's post confirms that to me.

And I can guaran-damn-tee you if I posted in Spanish or some other language I do not speak very well that I would be awfully damn careful about tossing around words like that unless I meant them. Your mileage may vary - and based on the tact and restraint of your posts here in English over the years, almost certainly does.
 
What thoughts do you think he meant to convey with words like ethical, honesty, truthfulness that were somehow just distorted by translation errors? Maybe one misplaced word . . . but all of those? :rolleyes:
Maybe he was looking for the right word and using a shotgun approach, I don't know.
And I can guaran-damn-tee you if I posted in Spanish or some other language I do not speak very well that I would be awfully damn careful about tossing around words like that unless I meant them. Your mileage may vary - and based on the tact and restraint of your posts here in English over the years, almost certainly does.

Over the years, my tact has improved, and my restraint has certainly improved, to the point that I get regular "what happened to the OLD STeven?" e-mails.

What exactly are you saying, Ken?

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
I met and spoke with Vecio in Italy a couple years ago at the Milan show and at the Bergomi dinner. He's a very nice guy and a good collector. I don't think he was trying to criticize Michael Donato but was trying to say that something wasn't "right" with the knife, the knife isn't what the original collector wanted or desired and was modified after the fact so to speak, making it something it shouldn't be in his view.
(Posted from Italian speaking Torino while on vacation)
 
I agee with Vecio. It may be a standard business practice to not tell the full history of a knife and to lie by omission, but that does not make it ethical. A puveyor should protect the buyer as well as the consignee. People on this forum say the "Knife world" is a place of higher character...

Just because engraving was done after Loveless death as an homage (or sales trick) should not constrain Knifepuveyor from stating it...why not unless to trick the buyer? Think of it in terms of the golden rule, would you not want the full history of a knife disclosed to you? At a midwest arms collector show, the amatuer weekend dealer told me the Sunfish forge knife I was buying was old, unique, bought at auction and sent to Hanson for a refurb. Should not an online purveyor of a 29k knife do the same? The back story on the Sunfish forge knife did not stop me from buying it.
 
I agee with Vecio. It may be a standard business practice to not tell the full history of a knife and to lie by omission, but that does not make it ethical. A puveyor should protect the buyer as well as the consignee. People on this forum say the "Knife world" is a place of higher character...

Just because engraving was done after Loveless death as an homage (or sales trick) should not constrain Knifepuveyor from stating it...why not unless to trick the buyer? Think of it in terms of the golden rule, would you not want the full history of a knife disclosed to you?



I don't see what your point is. A collector purchases a very desirable knife and has it engraved by one of the best living engravers- and then decides to sell it.
Michaels description of the knife-engraving is clear and to the point.



A homage to Bob Loveless? - perhaps
A sales trick?- that's ludicrous
As far as I know no knife ever left the Loveless Shop engraved and therefore by your definition any Loveless knife that has been engraved must of been engraved as a "sales trick."

My guess is the knife was engraved as a personal decision and the collector has decided to sell it. The hope when engraving a knife is that the engraving WILL enhance the knife and therefore make it more valuable. To some collectors any engraving will detract from the value-appearance of a knife.

There is a very well known and highly skilled knife maker whose knives are often canvasses for engraving by some the world's finest engravers. This maker does not like engraving on knives.
Does this mean that it would be contrary to the maker's wish to engrave one of his- or her knives and by doing so one would "devalue" the knife?

I have a an expensive knife that was delivered to me two years ago . It will be a four year wait to have the knife engraved by one of the "better known" engravers. Would I be less than honest or of little or no character if at some point in time I decided to sell the knife and didn't disclose that there was a four wait in engraving the knife?

Best,
Paul
 
As long as the same engraver did the work who cares about the timeline

No one misrepresented anything

I guess I should have gotten all my tattoos at once :)

I've had many things custom made for me and I've had many guns that have been done is stages

I just do not see the issue
 
Maybe he was looking for the right word and using a shotgun approach, I don't know.


Over the years, my tact has improved, and my restraint has certainly improved, to the point that I get regular "what happened to the OLD STeven?" e-mails.

What exactly are you saying, Ken?

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson

I am saying that the OP made some very unwarranted insinuations using words like honesty, truthfulness, and integrity. If he was "shotgunning" then he had Michael in his sights. I do not believe it was all some kind of linguistic accident and if by some chance it really was, he is certainly free to apologize any time. {Crickets}

As for your tact and restraint . . . IMO, yes they have improved. But there is a long history I think you would fairly have to concede.

Regardless, I will retract my YMMV remark in view of your improved tact and restraint.

Given that . . . in view of your improved tact and restraint . . . do you think that tossing around the kind of words the OP did in any language would be consistent with such tact and restraint? How about carelessly using such words in a language which you must therefore barely speak if at all if you thought they meant something completely different, and after being advised by more than one native speaker of the meaning of such words which you did not understand (:rolleyes:) and still not apologizing for it? Not very tactful or restrained, IMO.

I agee with Vecio. It may be a standard business practice to not tell the full history of a knife and to lie by omission, but that does not make it ethical. A puveyor should protect the buyer as well as the consignee. People on this forum say the "Knife world" is a place of higher character...

Just because engraving was done after Loveless death as an homage (or sales trick) should not constrain Knifepuveyor from stating it...why not unless to trick the buyer? Think of it in terms of the golden rule, would you not want the full history of a knife disclosed to you? At a midwest arms collector show, the amatuer weekend dealer told me the Sunfish forge knife I was buying was old, unique, bought at auction and sent to Hanson for a refurb. Should not an online purveyor of a 29k knife do the same? The back story on the Sunfish forge knife did not stop me from buying it.

Have you bought and sold a lot of engraved knives? If so, maybe you can help me out here.

There are literally hundreds of engraved knives offered for sale at purveyors' sites.

How many of those do you think provide detailed timelines and explanations of their engraving process, who commissioned the engraving, when it was done, etc., etc., etc. Maybe you can point me to some because I don't see it. I see a TON of engraved Joe Kious knives, without anyone stating who commissioned the engraving - Joe, a subsequent buyer, the purveyor, or even the engraver buying the knife himself with the intent of engraving it. BTW, I have NO idea either why I should care about any of that anyway (which might explain why no one posts that information).

IMO, that is just not the standard of the industry with regard to the sale of engraved knives. But again, I welcome any objective evidence you can provide to the contrary.

I don't see what your point is. A collector purchases a very desirable knife and has it engraved by one of the best living engravers- and then decides to sell it.
Michaels description of the knife-engraving is clear and to the point.



A homage to Bob Loveless? - perhaps
A sales trick?- that's ludicrous
As far as I know no knife ever left the Loveless Shop engraved and therefore by your definition any Loveless knife that has been engraved must of been engraved as a "sales trick."

My guess is the knife was engraved as a personal decision and the collector has decided to sell it. The hope when engraving a knife is that the engraving WILL enhance the knife and therefore make it more valuable. To some collectors any engraving will detract from the value-appearance of a knife.

There is a very well known and highly skilled knife maker whose knives are often canvasses for engraving by some the world's finest engravers. This maker does not like engraving on knives.
Does this mean that it would be contrary to the maker's wish to engrave one of his- or her knives and by doing so one would "devalue" the knife?

I have a an expensive knife that was delivered to me two years ago . It will be a four year wait to have the knife engraved by one of the "better known" engravers. Would I be less than honest or of little or no character if at some point in time I decided to sell the knife and didn't disclose that there was a four wait in engraving the knife?

Best,
Paul

Nice to see you posting here my friend. Good points, all. And Happy 39th Birthday!

As long as the same engraver did the work who cares about the timeline

No one misrepresented anything

I guess I should have gotten all my tattoos at once :)

I've had many things custom made for me and I've had many guns that have been done is stages

I just do not see the issue

I echo Roger . . .

^^^ Exactly.
 
OK, you are right perhaps that all are not appropriate terms; my motherlanguage is not english .. but don't reduce the whole as a form .. substance above form.

To me it IS about the substance.

The rest of your words in your posts are used appropriately and correctly. You certainly seemed to understand the meaning of "smarmy" very well, which is a much more unusual and rarely used word than ethical, honesty, or untruthfulness - and which I think some native English speakers would not even know.

If you did not mean to say that the way this knife was offered for sale was unethical, untruthful, or lacked honesty, why don't you try again with different words? Hell, post the words you mean in your native language (Italian?) and we'll run them through a translator.

You probably do not care what I think, but I will say anyway that I think you should just apologize.
 
I met and spoke with Vecio in Italy a couple years ago at the Milan show and at the Bergomi dinner. He's a very nice guy and a good collector. I don't think he was trying to criticize Michael Donato but was trying to say that something wasn't "right" with the knife, the knife isn't what the original collector wanted or desired and was modified after the fact so to speak, making it something it shouldn't be in his view.
(Posted from Italian speaking Torino while on vacation)

Thank you Martin, that's exactly what I've thought !

And know stop for me; I'm disappointed The Virginian spoke from "shotgunning" with Michael in my sights.
The majority of the dealers know perfectly how kind of knives they deal with, all details, they are very competent and they don't always describe everything : just that !
Be carefull, I don't say they lie, I say they keep quiet : at least for me, who am a collector, it is not enough.
And again , this is not an accusation, this is my free opinion and remark foundet on many years of observing with disenchanted eye .... it is maybe time to change ... or not ?

Regards my friends
 
I think you guys are really loosing the point, which is quite simple.
Many times in different periods the art world has been afflicted by the "pimp my ride" syndrome, and masterpieces has been deturped by discutible tastes of people from the past who tought better "enhancing" other people's work, adding some sparkles.
Any owner has the right to do whatever he wants with his stuff, but IMHO it is not necessarily a good idea, nor a form of "respect" to the maker by any stretch.
 
I think you guys are really loosing the point, which is quite simple.
Many times in different periods the art world has been afflicted by the "pimp my ride" syndrome, and masterpieces has been deturped by discutible tastes of people from the past who tought better "enhancing" other people's work, adding some sparkles.
Any owner has the right to do whatever he wants with his stuff, but IMHO it is not necessarily a good idea, nor a form of "respect" to the maker by any stretch.

If that IS indeed the point, perhaps you can explain to me how the concepts of ethics, honesty and truthfulness are engaged in this instance?

One may be possessed of an entirely valid subjective opinion that embellishments to a given knife are aesthetically unappealing or inconsitent with design language of the maker. But whose ethics, honesty or truthfulness are brought into question on this basis?

I just don't see it.

And frankly, I think that lightly calling someone's personal integrity into question is something that simply should not happen on this forum. I would have been more than willing to cut the OP some slack on the language issue if he had quickly resiled from that original statement and apologized to Michael for saying something he had not intended.

If someone has lied, cheated, stolen or willfully misrepresented in the context of the sale of a knife, I am all for calling it out.

But get your damned facts straight before you do so.
 
Michael's honesty and integrity are not in question. The OP's smarmy attempt to suggest otherwise suggests a serious lack of judgment, IMO.

I find many of Rogers posts to be inflammatory, throwing a first punch in an otherwise cordial conversation. Here is an example, calling someone that has limited English skills as "Smarmy". Read the title of the thread, isn't it obvious? I see nothing insincere about the Ops opening question. He did not name the dealer, though giving a few key details- he did admittedly, to explain the situation. It wasn't all that personally motivated, in my reading.
Thanks,
David
 
I find many of Rogers posts to be inflammatory, throwing a first punch in an otherwise cordial conversation. Here is an example, calling someone that has limited English skills as "Smarmy". Read the title of the thread, isn't it obvious? I see nothing insincere about the Ops opening question. He did not name the dealer, though giving a few key details- he did admittedly, to explain the situation. It wasn't all that personally motivated, in my reading.
Thanks,
David

100% agree. I'll use a word I used in a previous disagreement with Roger. Obviously (that's the word) the OP's thread wasn't about Michael Donato.
 
Who suggested it wasn't worth the price? Has he been beaten down for it yet?

The game "telephone" is where an original story gets told in different ways, grievances made by different people and evolves into an entirely different thing. Suddenly we have a bad guy!
David
 
Knowing the provenance of a piece of art is called smart collecting. Disclosing how a piece of art was created, when it involves two artists, Loveless and Fracassi just kind of makes sense to my simple mind. Why not post a knife with it's history? How many people who have responded to this thread would not want to know the history of the knife and its engraving? If you wouldn't buy it w/o knowing the history, then you should expect it to be discussed in a listing for sale.

If the engraving was a joint effort, then the knife is a synthesis of two artists. If the engraving is one collector's idea, then maybe it works or even worse, it is graffiti.
 
it's hard to imagine Bob Loveless wanting to see his mug engraved onto a knife he made, lol!
 
it's hard to imagine Bob Loveless wanting to see his mug engraved onto a knife he made, lol!

If you are referring to one of the unique 46 knife set made by Loveless, he
actually loved the idea.... They all had amber stag handles, brass/steel pins
and "R.W.L." engraved on the ricasso. All the knives in this huge set
carried the maker's etch with Bob's portrait outline....

This was a custom order by the Italian collector Luigi Peppini,
who displayed his collection in my 4th book "The Great Collections" (2007)....

I think I sent it to you once as a gift?

Using that display of his knives in my book as reference,
Peppini sold his huge collection, in many cases breaking up
such unique sets between various collectors....

Here is a crop from that page...

All the best,
David Darom (ddd)

Luigi-Peppini.jpg
 
Back
Top