Which handheld GPS do you take hiking, backpacking?

I

ieraseu

Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
186
I've been looking at a few models from Garmin. The hardware looks good, but there seems to be some hidden cost as far as software (maps) that are purchased separately. What do you recommend as far as a handheld GPS?
 
My Garmin is a GPSMAP76S. If I were buying today, it'd be the GPSMAP76gsx.

Comparing the -76 series to the eTrex line:
The eTrex have smaller screens and generally lower capabilities, but they are much lighter weight and smaller, less expensive, have a picture-driven menu (vs. text only on the 76), and most models have the cool thumb stick.

For a casual budget-minded GPS shopper who does not intend to buy the additional map software, I would recommend the eTrex Basic Yellow. It takes a reading as well as any other unit, is very affordable, and easy to spot if dropped. You can't load maps into it, but you can download/upload data between the unit and a computer.

If you want to load the Garmin maps onto the unit, the eTrex Legend is the most basic unit with that capability. The Legend is available with different features as well, depending on how much you want to spend.

A lot of people like the 60 series as well, but I don't have any persona experience with those so can't recommend nor discourage.

Hope this helps!
-Bob
 
I recently acquired my first GPS reciever. I got the Garmin GPSMap 60 Csx. I have only used it casually so I don't have an in depth review to give you but I'm pleased with it so far.

I put Topo 2008 and City Navigator NT on it so I can go hiking, camping, fishing etc using the topo maps and it'll do turn by turn routing in the car using City Navigator.

Everything I've done with it I have learned just by playing around with it for a few minutes. I haven't cracked the manual open. Since this is my first reciever and I have no previous experience with GPS I'd say that's a testament to it relative ease of use.

I got mine online with the $50 rebate that Garmin has been offering.
 
My first was a Magellan that lasted a couple years. I sent it back for repair and they said it was obsolete, just buy a new one. I've had an etrex now for several years and have no need of anything else. Small, simple and foolproof, it will not allow me to make a mistake yet is quick and easy to use.:) Regards, ss.
 
Do you have any more information on the $50 rebate? Do you know if the promotion is still going? Thanks.
 
I had the Etrex Legend for years and loved it. It has the ability to add maps if desired. Pretty good straight out of the box. The only "issue" with this unit is it will lose the signal sometimes in heavy foliage. I just purchased the GPSMap 60cx. It is great!!! It has the updated receiver and I can get a lock on satelites in my house. Also has the ability to add maps. This unit has turn by turn directions for routes. Depending on your intended usage and pocketbook either is a good buy in my opinion.
 
I had a Garmin Rino that is the GPS with a walkie talkie, I really like that thing a lot. It has a good sized screen, and can be used with any of the family band walkies out there. I found I didn't use it too much though so ended up trading it.
 
What are your thoughts on a model with 'High Sensitivity' mode, versus one without. I notice it cuts a few hours off the battery life.
 
Answering the question in your subject, not in your post, I'm pleased using my Garmin gpsmap 60csx.

I also have an old beat-up Garmin etrex vista with a cracked face but it still works fine. Comparing these two I feel the more modern receiver is worth the added cost, not because of software features on the device but because it gets, maintains, and tracks a signal better.
 
The only "issue" with this unit is it will lose the signal sometimes in heavy foliage.
Click to expand...
Almost any unit will. I rarely lose the signal completely, but often get jumps that create a crazy zig-zag in the track file. Not a concern for casual hiking, but a major inconvenience when trying to map historic roads or features. One advantage of the more expensive units is the ability to add an external antenna, which really cuts down on the erratic signal jumps.
 
Currently I'm considering the eTrex Vista CX or eTrex Vista HCx. Apparently the HCx model adds a 'high sensitivity' receiver, while the CX model includes a 32mb micro SD card and a few hours more battery life.

Edit: After reading some customer reviews on Amazon, I'm fairly convinced the 'high sensitivity' receiver is a nice feature to have.
 
I also had an etrex legend, I got it after a few good reccomendations, and it works great for me. I like how it's waterproof.
 
Something to help you decipher the various model suffixes:

"S" - sensors. Built-in compass and barometer.
"H" - High Sensitivity
"C" - Color screen
"X" - USB connectivity and memory card slot

Color screen would be pretty far down my priority list considering how much extra Garmin charges for the color models. Having a real compass is a huge bonus and worth the extra price. And the memory card slots would be great to have too, and I'd gladly pay the extra for that.

Also I don't know where you plan to purchase from, but I usually find the best prices at www.gpsnow.com . For accessories like cables, antennas, and cases the Gilsson-brand products from www.gpsgeek.com cost a fraction of the Garmin-brand accessories.
 
Gramin GPS 60csx. Color screen, upgradable memory, 18 hours per pair of AA batteries. I also carry a compass and a map, just in case.
 
I have the basic eTrex model. It is good for marking spots in my hunting area, but I would not rely on it as my only source for land navigation. It is easy to use, compact, waterproof, and under $100. Cons: it can lose a signal fairly easily if it is under the trees.
 
ieraseu,

Get the Garmin HCx model. I have used the old model extensively and currently own the new RINO 530HCx. This thing will hold a signal in the thickest of woods, something the older models have trouble with.

Go with the high sensitive GPS receiver.
 
I recently got the Garmin MAP60 CSx .The high sensitivity lets me get a signal inside my house ! But in heavy forest or mountains it could be helpful. I added the Topo map which is good for hiking. Will take AA either alkyline or NiMH which is the same as my camera. Too new to make further comment.
 
ieraseu said:
I've been looking at a few models from Garmin. The hardware looks good, but there seems to be some hidden cost as far as software (maps) that are purchased separately. What do you recommend as far as a handheld GPS?
Click to expand...

What are you planning to use it for exactly?

Sorry should have read the title, for hiking and backpacking I would recommend one of the Garmin Etrex series; cheap, reliable, good on batteries. WAAS is a nice feature to have as you will get higher precision through differential correction as long as a WAAS satellite is in view. I use a lot of different GPS' at work (from $100 Garmin's to $40,000 Trimble's) and would only recommend Garmin (to a typical user). I personally own a Garmin III and a 176.

As others have mentioned here, a GPS should never be relied upon as your principal means of navigation; it is no substitue for a map and compass.
 
The SIRF III chipset in the 60 and 76 series are tops when it comes to holding a lock in heavy cover. The basic eTrex models are inexpensive, but they do tend to lose their satellite lock in deep canyons or heavy timber. This can be a real PITA when you want a track of your wanderings. The new "High Sensetivity" chipset Garmin has released is reportedly much better than the standard eTrex models, but not quite as good as the SIRF III. The cool thing is you can get the RHINO in an "H" model if you want to be able to keep track of your mates or dogs in the field.

A GPS is NOT a substitute for a proper map, compass, and related skills. That being said, rejecting a GPS as a gimmick or crutch is technophobic. I don't NEED a GPS to stay found, but the added functionality adds to my time in the outdoors, and my ability to review my adventures afterwards.

-- FLIX
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top