• Preorders are LIVE for the 2024 BladeForums Traditional Knife

    Traditional Knife Information Thread - make sure you go in there and read up.

    Requirements: Be a Gold or higher member or have been a member of the forums since 6/2023 with at least 100 posts in the Traditional Forum. Preorder is for people who live in the continental US only, international orders will be separate.

    Delivery expected in Q4 2024, hopefully before the holidays.

    User Name
    Serial number request

Which is "better" prototype: marked or sterile?

I

IamMatt

Joined
Mar 20, 2002
Messages
927
Any opinions on whether a prototype is better, or more desirable, or more valuable if it is marked with the maker's mark and/or other indicia (such as "prototype") or if it is totally sterile (assuming you have authentication from the maker that it is his)? Thanks.
 
I won't go as far as saying that the knife is "better."
Typically. . .a knife is worth more and are sought after more when it is marked as a "prototype." Same is true of ones that have very low serial numbers.
 
Ditto Jeff and it's only worth what the interest is in that model or maker, so if there is a big demand for any maker his prototypes are in high demand, so prototypes don't mean a thing without knowing the market.

James
 
Usually an unmarked knife is ery hard to identify.

I just got into a bidding war for a Harkins prototype at eBay. By all acounts the knife was pure Harkins but it was sterile and not a model I could find anywhere else.

It ended up going for $106.00, the punk edged me out at the last minute ;)
 
Interesting the year I quit drinking I also didn't mark a blade. One showed up in A.G.'s catalog years later and was correctly identified as a Greco, un marked. The new knives are not marked either, nto because I've started drinking again but because the steel is hardened before grinding,ensuring a straighter blade. Powder coating would cover up any etch. John Greco
 
I buy 2 or 3 thousand knives a year maybe more. If a knife is not marked with makers mark I will pay less for it. In my opinion a maker owes a collector a name on his knives. As far as marking a knife Prototype it can go two ways. Some makers are good from the first knife hence marking the knife Prototype might make it a little more valuable. If some other makers are not so good now, they will get better the first will be less desirable. You get my point.
 
I can see no reason that a marked prototype would be worth less than an unmarked one. Because of the possible difficulties with authentication I can see that unmarked prototypes could end up being worth very little. If a knife is unmarked and of a style that is not easily recognizable as coming from the maker in question, it would be best to have a letter of authentication. Even if the knife is easily recognizable, it would be advisable to have the knife authenticated by the maker if possible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top