Which SAK's have scissors other than the Classic?

UnknownVT said:
What patrickb (the original poster) asked for is a pair of scissors with a KNIFE.

A SAK is a KNIFE - with a folder action that is a worldwide benchmark standard - that others strive for.
Click to expand...
Unknown,
As I recall, patrickb also said:

patrickb said:
...
I really need a small, portable pair of scissors w/a knife.

Come to think of it, maybe it's time to jump up to a mini multi-tool? I have an older version LM Super Tool, but I need something much smaller than that and the scissors are a must. Any recommendations? Thx for your help.
Click to expand...

So, a scissors first and a small mini tool is what I suggested. If a scissors is more important than the knife blade, a small tool is better. (The tools I listed have stronger, bigger scissors than a SAK). OTOH, Sak scissors work well enough, and a larger SAK (3 or 3.5") would probably fit the bill also, but mini-tools are short like the SAK classic, but a bit wider. It depends whether we are concerned with width or length and how important the scissors are.

So I don't think I'm leading anyone astray... or am I? ;)
 
I really like the model called the Diplomat that Wenger produces.
Nice size for the pocket, comes with Wenger's springless scissors,nail file,large blade,key ring and tweezers.....nice little unit.

Kap
 
The Executive SAK, had one of those for the past 23 years now! About the longest running knife to ever grace my pockets!

That knife, a Fisher space pen and an ARC AAA flashlight are always in my left front pocket, without fail, a good combination.

The Executive is a bit longer than the Classic, but has a nice fruit cutter/screwdriver as well, excellent for oranges and the like.
G2
 
If my memory serves me correct one of the SAK's put out a knifeless model - I can't remember if it had scissors or not. The Fisherman does - I have had one since 1982 and replaced the spring once.
 
klattman said:
So, a scissors first and a small mini tool is what I suggested. If a scissors is more important than the knife blade, a small tool is better. (The tools I listed have stronger, bigger scissors than a SAK). OTOH, Sak scissors work well enough, and a larger SAK (3 or 3.5") would probably fit the bill also, but mini-tools are short like the SAK classic, but a bit wider. It depends whether we are concerned with width or length and how important the scissors are.

So I don't think I'm leading anyone astray... or am I? ;)
Click to expand...

Of course not - everyone has an .....
opinion(!) ;)

but it's funny you didn't mention the knife blade in the multi-tool, isn't it?

Seriously, how many multi-tools would you buy for the knife?

Whereas there are plenty of people who do buy the SAK for its scissors......

--
Vincent

http://UnknownVincent.cjb.net/
http://UnknownVT.cjb.net/
 
We aren't recommending a full sized, pliers-based multitool, so the comments about pliers and tool clumping do not apply. It is true that the blade on the Micra and Squirt S4 is small compared to a 3.5" SAK, but it is more than adequate for anything that Patrick is using the Classic for today.

And again, his primary use is for the scissors. The precision cutting SAK scissors are good for things like first aid, trimming fingernails, cutting paper, etc. I don't know what Patrick's uses are, but if he is breaking his Classic every so often, I assume he is using it for heavier cutting. If so, the Micra or S4 would be a good choice, since they are very durable. It helps to have handled both types of tools side-by-side, and your early bad experience with the Supertool doesn't really apply to the Micra or S4. They each have their use...:)
 
Thanks to all for he very informative responses. I've always liked my little SAK Classic and my only experience with a multi-tool has been with my original version LM SuperTool. I never liked the locking/unlocking method on it, but the pliers come in handy often. I can't remember using the knife much.

I like the idea of the new mini multi tools as it's the scissors that I used most often on the Classic. The Phillips head was the other most used item on my big LM, but I never had it with me as it was too big to carry. I want something easily pocketable, hence a newer beefier SAK or S4. I just need to decide which features are more important. I typically have another knife on hand, so maybe the S4 is the way to go, however, if I happen to NOT have a knife on hand, then I'd really wish I went with the SAK.

I'm more confused than ever. I think I'll get both :~)
 
UnknownVT said:
Of course not - everyone has an .....
opinion(!) ;)

but it's funny you didn't mention the knife blade in the multi-tool, isn't it?

Seriously, how many multi-tools would you buy for the knife?

Whereas there are plenty of people who do buy the SAK for its scissors......

--
Vincent

http://UnknownVincent.cjb.net/
http://UnknownVT.cjb.net/
Click to expand...

Just to bring closure...

The knives on the S4 and the tough chip are a similar size to the SAK classic which is looking to be replaced (in this thread). If a bigger SAK is selected then there is no question which knife is better.

OTOH the scissors on the S4 and chip are about 2 or more times longer than the scissors on a classic and still longer and stronger than those on even a bigger SAK.

I'm not biased, I EDC a SAK Cybertool 41 and a classic or minichamp on my keychain, but if I want to cut thicker things with a scissiors, I reach for the tough chip or my S4 in my bag or desk drawer.

Now I AM trying to lead you astray ;)
 
patrickb said:
I'm more confused than ever. I think I'll get both :~)
Click to expand...


There's your answer, get both and compare them.. and don't forget to post your review here :cool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top