- Joined
- Dec 20, 2005
- Messages
- 2,045
!&%$#@ #*)()@&! @**&%! If we are now going to attribute the quote to one person, allow me to make it prefectly clear that I had no idea who said it at the time of my previous post. I myself have no idea who may have said it.
Now, allow me to explain my reaction here. It is a fun hobby for some lurkers on the internet to set up human cock fights between well known makers. Ad hominem attack has never been my style, it is a false argument and thus I have no use for it, a review of any posts I have made will show this, yet a combination of malicious cronyism and political correctness in this business can make almost any position one takes a personal attack. One can say that they prefer S7 in larger blades over 5160 and invariably somebody in the crowd will think hmmm my friend John Doe uses 5160, what does this guy have against John? Now even though around a bazillion people use 5160, word will get out that you personally have it out for John Doe.
For a while, around twice a year I would get a message or phone call from one very well known smith, because some scumbag was playing games and pitting us against each other. The method was often along the lines of a factually weak statement unconnected to anyh one person being made in a forum thread, I would post and give contrary facts, then several posts later the other smiths name would be mentioned and in some way connected to the original position. Then the other smith would be informed that Kevin Cashen was saying that they were full of !@# and that folks shouldnt buy their book, knives, widgets or whatever, when that smiths name wasnt even mentioned until a week after I had left the thread.
As this continued I started to be certain that I said very complimentary things about that smith and his stuff whenever his name was mentioned. Now this is no joke, but I then got a phone call from him after he had been told that I was claiming he had underworld connections and was saying nice things out of fear for my life! I am not making this up, this really happened. Of course the other smith was smarter than this and we now find it all humorous and wait to see the next wacky thing the knit wits can throw our way. But if I ever find out who the weasel was that was doing it, my Christianity will be sorely tested.
Now that smith does not post here, nor I believe does the game playing scumbag, but it has happened with a few other smiths to a lesser degree. Why me? I believe it is a way that the field has of policing unpopular thought. I make no secret of the fact that I have an agenda to hold intense factual light up to all the hype, myth and hooey this business has been shackled with for so long. I like to present facts, but when one threatens the B.S. that too many hold dear with facts that they cannot deal with one way to fight back is to make it personal and use peer pressure. If you can turn enough of the heretics peers against him, the personal pressure may be enough to silence him; the problem is the facts still remain.
Flaming is a cowardly way out of an internet conversation when you realize your position is too weak to stand. When your position is strong and your facts are good, you can afford to be a gentleman and calmly rely on reason. One has no use for ad hominem tactics if they have facts.
Now before I end up getting a call from yet another smith, I have never met Mr. Bagwell, his knives are very well known and appear to be very collectible and thus worthy investments. I have no idea if he said anything like the above statement, I dont care because it is irrelevant. My comments, as always were directed at the premise not at a person.
I took time out for this long winded post to nip yet another bit of silliness in the bud. I hate this sort of crap, but I will not be silenced by these techniques. It is safe to say that political correctness has achieved total victory when it even reaches bladesmiths.
Damn dude, take it easy. If you hadn't noticed, I quoted your statements after I mentioned Mr. Bagwell -his name was mentioned by jdm61, who made this post:
In the Loveless book, Bill Moran said that 9260 makes a blade that is even tougher than his O1/1010 damascus. Bill Bagwell was the "prophet" of the "Damascus cutting effect" as i recall. Remember that the stuff Moran was making back then was fairly low carbon...like O1 diluted to the carbon content of 1050 and high layer count, so the carbon would have totally migrated I would guess. Like the stuff that Don Hanson made with wrought iron and W2.
There was no intention to say that you (Mr. Cashen) made that statement.
I was interested by your post on damascus steel, and quoted that to ask which combinations would be competitive with O1 -if O1 were not allowed to be one of the constituents of the damascus.
Maybe I should have made separate posts. I apologize for the confusion.
Peace.
