Who would like to see an SRK II?

U

uccman

Joined
Jul 28, 1999
Messages
26
I'd like to see an "SRK II" with G-10 handles and a (larger) metal guard with a blade an inch longer. Anyone else?
 
I would like to see a srk II in a full tang construction, micarta handles, and a seven inch blade.
 
Yes, I'd sure like an updated version. Please a stainless guard (single guard).
Greetings
red
 
The knife you want is already in production. It's called the Fallkniven A-1
 
DOH! So that's the reason I liked the looks of the A-1. Couldn't put my finger on it. DANG! Yet another one to buy!!

Anyone got the web address? TIA

[This message has been edited by Outlaw_Dogboy (edited 17 November 1999).]
 
SRK II would be kickass. I'd buy one definately.

Fallkniven A1 is nice, sonsiderign one myself. Anyone know how thick they are? they even 3/16?
 
I think the SRK is just fine in length. There are lot's of bigger knives. 6" is very practical for basic uses.

Now a 1/2 inch more for the handle I can dig. Maybe a flat grind blade. A protruding tang like the Fallkniven is great.
 
I agree that the blade length is fine as is, but I would like to see a different handle material, like micarta.
 
I have been wishing for a seven inch blade SRK for a long time now. This is a great blade length for this knife, would add greatly to the versatility IMHO. Didn't think about adding G-10 on the handle though. And a higher flat grind. Wow! Outstanding ideas! Talk about taking a knife to a new level...WHOA!
Anyone have regular contact with Lynn Thompson?
wink.gif


------------------
If a person with multiple personalities threatens suicide, is that considered a hostage situation?

 
How about a 3/16" thick Recon Scout?

I like my 5/16" one with 7.5" blade, but a thinner blade would cut better and be lighter to pack. It would give up some chopping power, however.

Nice, full, flat grind.

G-10 handles with tapered semi-full tang?
 
Ron1,
By Jove!!! I think you've got it!!


------------------
If a person with multiple personalities threatens suicide, is that considered a hostage situation?

 
Anybody know Lynn Thompson? I think CS should come up with something like what's been described here. They would certainly sell. They need to make new knives to keep it interesting. I used to love CS, now I think I just got tired of the same old thing.
 
Scaling the length and width down to a blade length of 5 inches while keeping the handle the same size, adding an exposed tang, and maybe some more durable handle material would make for a nice knife. If the price can be kept down too of course.
 
Fudo (and all) -- whose posting are you referring to? The Fallkniven A1, by all accounts, appears to be a fine knife in its own right, but it has none of the "additional features" Uccman would like to see in a SRK "II".

Both the SRK and A1 have Kraton handles (which, personally, I find more comfortable than a full tang for even light chopping). They also have single molded guards -- also very efficient and practical for general utility (I find the double guard on most of CS's fixed blades pretty pointless...).

The SRK has a 6" hollow ground short clip pt made of CS's propietary "carbon V" (apparently similar to O1 tool steel). The A1 lists a 6-3/8" blade which is halfway between a spear-pt and drop-pt; I believe it's saber-ground, and made of the recently highly appraised VG10.

I've used the SRK (taught basic wilderness skills courses till a few years ago) and find it an excellent all-round knife. Keeps a great edge and is very tough -- will split *lots* of small firewood and kindling, sharpen a dozen tent stakes, and other similar chores, and still have a nice edge for food prep.

I haven't handled the A1 yet, but would be curious to hear from those who have used both the SRK and the A1. Personally, I think 4.5"-6", 7-10 oz, is ideal for all general utility and "survival" purposes -- longer/heavier than that, and you begin to sacrifice efficiency for 95% of all tasks in order to gain improved performance for 5% (e.g., heavy chopping, which can be accomplished by other means, anyway, w/greater efficiency and safety, and less energy).

I imagine one of the A1's advantages is its exposed tang for hammering w/the pommel. (How significant? depends on your needs/wants...) Its VG10 also obviously offers better corrosion resistance; but how well does it compare to the SRK's carbon V in terms of edge-holding and overall toughness?

Curious...
Glen

------------------
“How unfortunate that youth is wasted on young people." Mark Twain

 
Oh, one more thing: the SRK sports a 3/16" thick blade to complement its hollow grind, while the A1 lists a 6 mm thick (just about 1/4") blade along w/its saber grind.

That difference should indicate their different emphases in strength: the SRK is probably (slightly) better for the slice-and-dice crowd, while the A1 is probably (slightly) better for the hack-and-slash crowd. But again, these are simply emphases: both designs are versatile enough to effectively meet 95% of all conceivable uses. Depending on your needs/wants/preferences, one may be better for YOU, but I doubt either is objectively better than the other. They're both very affordable, and have proven to deliver excellent performance. Match to your needs/preferences accordingly, and you can't go wrong...

(Sorry for the long-winded... I'm procrastinating from grading mid-terms...)

Glen

------------------
“How unfortunate that youth is wasted on young people." Mark Twain

 
I was looking at the S-1 but am back to looking at Cold Steel as the Carbon V did so much better on slicing, edge holding and durability than the VG10 in the 7in test. There are differences in edge profile to account for in the performance diferences but the big differences in cost can't be explained away.
 
Fallkniven A1 full tang?

And 6mm thick - that's like an in between of 3/16in and 1/4in, right?
 
The srk is hollow ground?! Since when? I have one a couple years old and its a saber(flat) grind..... did they change?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top