If my math/understanding isn’t incorrect, diamond pastes are vastly more expensive than the diamond powder that they contain. I realize that it takes money and time to develop a decent paste and that producing that paste takes money and time as well, but I feel that the discrepancy between the two is larger than those costs would explain.
Let’s assume that 5 grams of a high concentration of 20 percent unbranded mono-crystalline diamond paste costs $20. That paste thus contains 0.2⨉5g=1g=5ct of diamond powder. The going eBay rate for unbranded diamond powder 100ct=20g is around the same $20. That means that the diamond paste costs 100/5=20 times as much as the diamond powder. Sure, unbranded diamond powder on eBay is probably not the best quality diamond you can find and it does seem to be a lot harder to find branded diamond powder than branded diamond paste (which is no surprise, I suppose), but even so, 20 times more expensive seems excessive.
So, where’s the mistake in my reasoning?
Let’s assume that 5 grams of a high concentration of 20 percent unbranded mono-crystalline diamond paste costs $20. That paste thus contains 0.2⨉5g=1g=5ct of diamond powder. The going eBay rate for unbranded diamond powder 100ct=20g is around the same $20. That means that the diamond paste costs 100/5=20 times as much as the diamond powder. Sure, unbranded diamond powder on eBay is probably not the best quality diamond you can find and it does seem to be a lot harder to find branded diamond powder than branded diamond paste (which is no surprise, I suppose), but even so, 20 times more expensive seems excessive.
So, where’s the mistake in my reasoning?
My thoughts being the manufacturer so say $4 for the manufacturer. That would bring the retail price up to $18 or so if everyone is ok with such a low markup. That is how you get $20 tins of diamond stropping compound. If the manufacturer does the distribution and some direct sales, amazing what this does to the profit margin, then the price may be closer to the $10.50 mark.