If my math/understanding isn’t incorrect, diamond pastes are vastly more expensive than the diamond powder that they contain. I realize that it takes money and time to develop a decent paste and that producing that paste takes money and time as well, but I feel that the discrepancy between the two is larger than those costs would explain.
Let’s assume that 5 grams of a high concentration of 20 percent unbranded mono-crystalline diamond paste costs $20. That paste thus contains 0.2⨉5g=1g=5ct of diamond powder. The going eBay rate for unbranded diamond powder 100ct=20g is around the same $20. That means that the diamond paste costs 100/5=20 times as much as the diamond powder. Sure, unbranded diamond powder on eBay is probably not the best quality diamond you can find and it does seem to be a lot harder to find branded diamond powder than branded diamond paste (which is no surprise, I suppose), but even so, 20 times more expensive seems excessive.
So, where’s the mistake in my reasoning?
Let’s assume that 5 grams of a high concentration of 20 percent unbranded mono-crystalline diamond paste costs $20. That paste thus contains 0.2⨉5g=1g=5ct of diamond powder. The going eBay rate for unbranded diamond powder 100ct=20g is around the same $20. That means that the diamond paste costs 100/5=20 times as much as the diamond powder. Sure, unbranded diamond powder on eBay is probably not the best quality diamond you can find and it does seem to be a lot harder to find branded diamond powder than branded diamond paste (which is no surprise, I suppose), but even so, 20 times more expensive seems excessive.
So, where’s the mistake in my reasoning?