- Joined
- Apr 12, 2009
- Messages
- 13,432
When I hear or read, "don't ever grind to a burr" as advice given to someone still learning sharpening, I read it more as "don't make sure your edge is ready for the next stage of refinement." It's really bad advice to someone who's still trying to figure it all out. The burr has huge significance in sharpening. It's the definitive proof the process has gone as far as possible, with nothing to be gained in grinding further, and the kick-off point for the refining steps. And learning to form it, and then minimize it's size and clean it up, is all just part of the learning curve. It's a good thing, even if we're sometimes a little uncomfortable with it. And learning how to deal with it is the permanent fix for that uncomfortable feeling, forever.
Once one has seen a burr on their edge, and taken steps to clean it up and verify what it means (in terms of sharpness achieved), it gets easier to minimize or even avoid a burr. That's only if one has already figured out how sharp the edge is capable of getting (as originally proven by the existence of the burr). In other words, there comes a point where one knows, with repeated experience* with a particular knife, that it's at it's sharpest, or very nearly and satisfactorily so; even if they've recognized it slightly before much or any burr forms.
* Edited to add:
At ~1:50 into the referenced video, Cliff Stamp even points out specifically, when he's doing the initial shaping of the bevels, that he "knows, from experience with this knife, how long it takes" to go far enough in shaping the bevels and the apex. Lacking that experience with a particular blade means not knowing how long it takes, unless one is watching what's happening at the apex very, very closely. That's where the presence of the burr will announce very clearly and without ambiguity, it's gone far enough.
David
Once one has seen a burr on their edge, and taken steps to clean it up and verify what it means (in terms of sharpness achieved), it gets easier to minimize or even avoid a burr. That's only if one has already figured out how sharp the edge is capable of getting (as originally proven by the existence of the burr). In other words, there comes a point where one knows, with repeated experience* with a particular knife, that it's at it's sharpest, or very nearly and satisfactorily so; even if they've recognized it slightly before much or any burr forms.
* Edited to add:
At ~1:50 into the referenced video, Cliff Stamp even points out specifically, when he's doing the initial shaping of the bevels, that he "knows, from experience with this knife, how long it takes" to go far enough in shaping the bevels and the apex. Lacking that experience with a particular blade means not knowing how long it takes, unless one is watching what's happening at the apex very, very closely. That's where the presence of the burr will announce very clearly and without ambiguity, it's gone far enough.
David
Last edited: