I own and use a built-to-order Cowry X damascus knife with 5-inch flat grind clip point blade, also a Dozier Sisu knife 4.25-inch semihollow grind clip point blade having AISI 410 laminated (machine forge welded??) to D-2 center ply bought last year. Both blades are sharpened on the same Gatco diamond-stone fixture to have 19-degree edge [each side]. Cowry X blade is just under .200 inch thick at blade back. Sisu blade is .158 inch thick at blade back.
***
For every cutting job - that includes, routine kitchen/meal preparation except slicing bread, field dressing whitetail deer and two elk, jointing, and skinning but not caping - my Sisu is easier to use efficiently. Within very broad limits, Sisu cuts and maneuvers more easily than the Cowry X. Intuitively, this is wrong.
My Cowry X knife is better finished. Cutting edge material is significantly superior - on paper. In terms of blades' overall configuration, the only differences I perceive are flat grind on one, semihollow grind on the other, and Sisu is thinner.
Is my perception that the lesser quality knife [steel] is easier to use really accurate? If it is, why?
***
For every cutting job - that includes, routine kitchen/meal preparation except slicing bread, field dressing whitetail deer and two elk, jointing, and skinning but not caping - my Sisu is easier to use efficiently. Within very broad limits, Sisu cuts and maneuvers more easily than the Cowry X. Intuitively, this is wrong.
My Cowry X knife is better finished. Cutting edge material is significantly superior - on paper. In terms of blades' overall configuration, the only differences I perceive are flat grind on one, semihollow grind on the other, and Sisu is thinner.
Is my perception that the lesser quality knife [steel] is easier to use really accurate? If it is, why?