G'Day,
You are aware I avoid controversy,
however I have some questions which may not be quite politically correct. I will take no response as indeed a response.
You need to refer to the thread quoted by 'Upstream' in the Herman Williams Thread which makes pretty interesting reading on the then pending clearance of the Schrade "Wall Collection".
In reading recent comments am I correct in assuming the Imperial Schrade Records were given away to a Collector Mr. Langston and is he the same 'Lt' that used to post on this forum?
Given 'Lt's' comment on 3rd October 2005 @11.40am which read "I can assure any one who is interested I will be happy to offer whatever information or opinions I can-Lt",and am I right in assuming these comments were made prior to being given the Schrade History?
Could these records have been given to someone who was an acknowledged Schrade expert as custodian of the history on behalf of all Schrade Collectors, given by whomever confidant in the knowledge that this information would be provided to Schrade Collectors as freely as it had been given in the past?
I,and other Forum Members have raised many questions that remain unanswered that must surely have answers within the Schrade History Documents.My recent query re the 3OT history is an example.
Should not this information be freely available if that was the intention of the donor or will it be given or even witheld if you will for personal gain, financial or emotional?
Will Mr Voyles be given free access to these records for his upcoming book in which case I guess we will end up paying to obtain this information in due course.
In his posts I referred to above 'Lt' clearly states he has issues with SMKW not sticking to an implied agreement not to split up "the Wall Collection" if or when they purchased and is this really any different to being provided with The Imperial Schrade History Documents and then not allowing access by those interested? In those posts 'Lt' is on record with many very disparaging remarks concerning the 'Tennessee connection 'so was it this connection that provided these documents for the good of all.In which case I change my view a tad of SMKW and Mr Taylor.
I ask these questions on behalf of all current posting Forum Members who desperately seek knowledge on our beloved Schrade History.
How do we move forward if positions remain unmoved and what is to be gained for the better good of all if info is witheld from this Forum.
If I am out of place asking these questions I'm sure retribution will be swift and well deserved, however if these are simply questions not to be answered because they should remain hidden for fear of upsettling the status quo then I make no apology. 'Lt' stated on AAPK forum of a Schrade question that the person should have asked there and NOT here.Why??Will someone tell me..life is all too short for us all not to let bygones be just that.
Those that can least afford it get to pay again?
Hoo Roo from a Lad from the Colonies who simply loves Schrade. Larry 303.
You are aware I avoid controversy,

You need to refer to the thread quoted by 'Upstream' in the Herman Williams Thread which makes pretty interesting reading on the then pending clearance of the Schrade "Wall Collection".
In reading recent comments am I correct in assuming the Imperial Schrade Records were given away to a Collector Mr. Langston and is he the same 'Lt' that used to post on this forum?
Given 'Lt's' comment on 3rd October 2005 @11.40am which read "I can assure any one who is interested I will be happy to offer whatever information or opinions I can-Lt",and am I right in assuming these comments were made prior to being given the Schrade History?
Could these records have been given to someone who was an acknowledged Schrade expert as custodian of the history on behalf of all Schrade Collectors, given by whomever confidant in the knowledge that this information would be provided to Schrade Collectors as freely as it had been given in the past?
I,and other Forum Members have raised many questions that remain unanswered that must surely have answers within the Schrade History Documents.My recent query re the 3OT history is an example.
Should not this information be freely available if that was the intention of the donor or will it be given or even witheld if you will for personal gain, financial or emotional?
Will Mr Voyles be given free access to these records for his upcoming book in which case I guess we will end up paying to obtain this information in due course.
In his posts I referred to above 'Lt' clearly states he has issues with SMKW not sticking to an implied agreement not to split up "the Wall Collection" if or when they purchased and is this really any different to being provided with The Imperial Schrade History Documents and then not allowing access by those interested? In those posts 'Lt' is on record with many very disparaging remarks concerning the 'Tennessee connection 'so was it this connection that provided these documents for the good of all.In which case I change my view a tad of SMKW and Mr Taylor.
I ask these questions on behalf of all current posting Forum Members who desperately seek knowledge on our beloved Schrade History.
How do we move forward if positions remain unmoved and what is to be gained for the better good of all if info is witheld from this Forum.
If I am out of place asking these questions I'm sure retribution will be swift and well deserved, however if these are simply questions not to be answered because they should remain hidden for fear of upsettling the status quo then I make no apology. 'Lt' stated on AAPK forum of a Schrade question that the person should have asked there and NOT here.Why??Will someone tell me..life is all too short for us all not to let bygones be just that.
Those that can least afford it get to pay again?
Hoo Roo from a Lad from the Colonies who simply loves Schrade. Larry 303.