- Joined
- May 18, 1999
- Messages
- 15,395
Originally posted by Howard Wallace
Yvsa,
I agree with you about missing the convex edges.
What's your gripe with the "habaki" bolster?
Howard when the "habaki" bolster first came out I thought it might be a good idea which was a "fix" to combat against loose scabbards and it actually worked for its purpose , for a while.

When it first came out the sarkis were making the scabbards to fit the blades and the bolster, when shoved into the throat of the scabbard, made for a tight fit that wasn't easily dislodged.
The last kukris I have purchased have scabbards made to fit the bolster so the "habaki" bolster has became less than worthless as the scabbards are now looser than ever before. At least a person could manipulate the scabbards much easier before the "habaki" bolster came into being. YMMV.
Another thing I question, after a great deal of thought, about the bolsters is a matter of strength. The old standard bolsters is IMO stronger because there is more material around the tang at a critical place so the support is greater than with the "habaki" bolsters.
With the "habaki" bolsters all that's surrounding the tang is a bit of thin brass and a miniscule amount of laha.
I also feel the "habaki" bolster helps contribute to the laziness of the kamis as it can hide mistakes.
They also have a tendency to make the handles and therefore the tangs longer than the old tried and true standard bolster.
Now if the "habaki" covered the blade just below the tang itself I think it could possibly be the best of both worlds, providing the sarkis made the scabbards to fit the blade instead of the bolster.
But in the end some things are just better left alone IMO.

Again YMMV.