The answer to your final question of why v edges are still being produced is that convex edges/grinds do not universally out perform v edges in the aspects you list. Also, the manufacturing of convex grinds is a little trickier than v grinds, making them a bit slower to make and a little more expensive, all else being equal, which it rarely is.
If you're talking about the cutting edge, I haven't noticed any difference from one to the other in cutting ability or edge holding. I use them interchangeably on my knives, depending on my mood.
If you are talking about the primary blade grind, from spine to edge or so, then the convex knives I've used cut worse than the v ground knives I've used. However, there is a lot of variation between different makers v and convex grinds, so its difficult to tell if comparisons are isolating just the grind. IIRC, the BRKT knives aim for a final edge bevel of 13 degrees per side. This is quite thin compared to what most people are used to using. If you haven't tried, thin your Puma's to a similar bevel and they may cut just as good.
Also, sharpening v edges doesn't require a lot of experience, but it does require some instruction. I taught my brother to sharpen in less than an hour with benchstones, free hand, to an arm hair shaving edge. If you stumble through on your own, it can take a lot of practice to learn to sharpen. If you can get some good instruction, it shouldn't take any more effort than convexing.