I am newish to these forums, but not new to either knives or CRK.
I recently watched a three hour podcast regarding CRK in which the hosts had various critiques: action, steel choice and finish being amongst them. I must be missing something because I have never taken issue with any of my CRK’s action - they are fluid and smooth. Sure they are not flippers, but the thumb studs have proven more than adequate and I have no problem using them as one handed knives. I can flick them all open, I don’t typically do so; because in daily use I have little need to. Is S35VN long in the tooth as a blade steel? Perhaps, but I can bring an edge back in minutes with little effort; and that edge is more than adequate for my uses. I personally respect the newer designs; but the more modern Olamic, Koenig, etc don’t really appeal to me. I have little doubt they are excellent, but for me I don’t appreciate the aesthetics or design too terribly much. Could I be missing out? Possibly, but a CRK to these eyes has a soul that the others don’t.
CRK might be dated, but they are just right for me and every time I use mine bring joy and satisfaction to the task at hand. A knife is first and foremost a cutting tool; I choose to use CRK because of their soul, legacy and pedigree - outdated or not.
Oddly enough while I own multiple 1911’s, I wouldn’t ever carry one, perhaps a contradiction of sorts.