Worst B/S/T Experience to Date: Steven Rutherford (glock45)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Feedback: +135 / =0 / -1
Joined
Apr 22, 2011
Messages
448
I could tell this in a lot of ways but none would be as transparent as letting the email exchanges between Steven (seller) and I (buyer) tell the story. Apologies for the delay in getting this up- my family was moving from MN to CA the week following the original transaction and things have been a little chaotic since then. And further apologies- this is a long one, but a helluva read...

A quick frame up: I saw this large CRK Carbon Fiber Insingo Sebenza for sale on the board and instantly wanted it, described as "Never carried, used or sharpened." Almost immediately Lone_Wolfe posts a reply to the OP which asked if the one listed by the OP is the same as another previously sold on the board (LW provides the link). The previously listed knife being described as "Knife is gently used." I click on LW's link and, sure enough, glock45 was the buyer.

A red flag but I'm blinded by lust so I email the seller an offer, he counters, I agree and send him the funds. I receive the knife the following week and instantly upon opening I deploy the blade and notice serious blade play. I'm relatively new to CRKs but I know this doesn't feel right so I email the seller and descend into the 7th Circle of Hell.

Me to Steven 5/28 @ 7:47 AM:
"Steve,

Received today. At rest she's beautiful, but I've got some serious concerns about the blade stability.

Blade is far from centered when folded, making contact with the CF scale and scrapes the CF scale when deploying out and folding back in. When partially open, blade has side-to-side blade play to the point I'd call it wobbly. Pivot screw was fully tightened when received, so I cannot try tightening it to remedy.

Please advise."

Steven to me 5/28 @ 2:27 PM:
"Will email you when home about 4:00CT. Do not like auto correct phones"

Steven to me 5/28 @ 4:34PM:
"Sorry for the delay in response, I don't like my photo correcting my sentence five or six times each time I write it. I am very sorry you are disappointed with the . I truly don't see any issues with blade play.I know having read much that it is common for this cf Insingo model to not be blade centered for what ever reason. The blade was not scratched or marked at all though when I sent it to you. I realise everyone has different perspectives on many things. So here are your options the way I see them.
1: send the Insingo to Chris Reeve under warranty to have them inspect it. It will cost you postage but no cost for any repairs under warranty that I have ever heard of. I f they send it back in the same condition you know that is how it is supposed to be. Carbon fiber in my opinion will GIVE more than steel/titanium. If you send this knife back to me, buy another one and get the same results nothing will be gained.
2: I don't want you to be unhappy with me thinking I took advantage of you or tried to screw you over. Look at my feedback rating. I want it to stay perfect. So if you decide
to return it to me for a full refund of your purchase price here is what I require.
a. Send it to me priority USPS mail ONLY.NOUPS OR FEDX It will come back to you as I can't sign for it or pick it up. My post office is 3 blocks away and I can get it when I get home.
b. It MUST be insured for the full cost of the knife Total shipping and insurance is about $12-$13 dollars.
c. Pack it well.
d. It MUST have all items in box that I sent you and be in the exact same condition as you received it. Not used carried or sharpened since you received it.
e.When I pick it up at the post office I will go directly home, open the package and if it meets all above conditions, I will directly paypal gift you the price you paid me for the Insingo. Gift since I already have the knife.
I have very high expectations and I'm sure you do too. I realy felt it was in excellent shape but what matters is what you think. It will hurt because I needed the money for car repairs but I will find another way, I want you to feel I have been fair with you. Let me know what you think ."

Me to Steven 5/28 @ 5:33 PM:
"Thanks for the prompt response Steve.

I did significant searching on CRK's pieces with the carbon fiber scale and consistently found claims of "No blade play" or the like and, try as I might, didn't find a single instance of someone experiencing what I'm seeing. Also, given the description of the knife in the posting I don't feel that sending back to Chris should be necessary.

That said, I will be sending this knife back to you in exactly the condition I received it. I am concerned that you seemed unaware of the blade play issue and could be led to believe that the condition you receive it in is not the condition it was in when you sent it. I can't explain the discrepancy but assure you I opened it once, felt the blade wiggle and sent you the original email. So, unless something happened while in the mail, you are receiving exactly as it was sent.

I am moving from MN to CA next week and will try to get it in the mail, with your below requisites, in the next couple of days and will send you the tracking number.

Lastly, while I appreciate your willingness to offer a full gifted refund, I find it bordering on unreasonable that this return is going to cost me ~$15 when I have zero liability here. I understand however that situations like this are an inherent risk of buying on the forum.

I'll be in touch.

-Rex"

Steven to me 5/28 @ 6:08 PM:
"I respect your position and your perspective. If this would have been a sub $100.00 sale no big deal. However you can understand the position I am in now. A +- $400.000 knife that I had returned, and that anal forum detectives that cratic everything you do, I will have a very hard time trying to sell this, so I don't think asking you to pay shipping and insurance is all that bad from your end. I am truly sorry you are not happy. I would like to afford to keep this but a $12.00 an hour job doesn't allow to much wiggle room when buying and selling expensive knives. I have collected knives for more than 40 years and after losing my good paying factory job of 25 years I have had to sell off most of what I have, not your problem, I understand. But most businesses do not pay you to send a return back to them and neither can I. Hopefully this doesn't give you too bad of an opinion of me and my practices. Thanks for your understanding."

Steven to me 5/28 @ 7:23 PM:
"After thinking about this, prove that I wanted to take advantage of you.. I did not enter in to this with the thought of screwing you. I will loose more than you unless you can prove I had planned on on it . Have a great day."

Me to Steven 5/28 @ 8:48 PM:
"I'm not sure I follow. I never claimed you were deliberately trying to deceive me, but that you were either unaware of the condition of the knife when you sent it or that you and I simply disagree on what condition "Never carried, used or sharpened" (from your listing) actually means. Either way, I've made it clear that I am unhappy with the condition, consider it different than your posting and have requested a refund. If anything, I took the high road here.

I've made my request clear and you have responded that you understood my position and agreed to take the knife back for a full refund. If you are changing course here, my next action will be to open a PayPal claim, one I'm confident I'll win. I believe the aggressive, defiant and challenging email you just sent will not work well in your favor, nor will your clearly dishonest listing that the knife was "Never carried, used or sharpened" though the person you purchased it from, as proven by the identified listing being shown, explicitly said it was infact not in unused condition ("Knife is gently used").

At this point, I'm now requesting that you refund my entire purchase price and only then will I return the knife. Short of this, I will be opening a PayPal claim tonight.

I encourage you to very quickly either send me notice that my payment has been refunded or let me know that you agree a PayPal claim is the best way to handle this.

-Rex"

At mid-night after not hearing back from Steven, I open a PayPal Goods and Services dispute for reason: "Significantly Other Than Described". I presume PayPal notified Steven of the claim having been opened.

Steven to me 5/29 @ 5:16 AM:
Rex, I will honor our agreement to take back the Insingo as originally stated. I will not pay you until I receive the knife and I will not pay you shipping or insurance, for all I know you could have just changed your mind about buying it. Sorry it escalated quickly last night. I have never had dealings with anyone such as this before. Let us just move forward and get through this as soon as possible and go our separate ways. What say you.

Me to Steven 5/29 @ 8:05 AM:
"Sorry Steve, that ship has sailed. You have shown a serious lack of integrity and I do not trust you.

Like you, whether as the buyer or as the seller, I always make PayPal payments as Goods & Services in the event something like this comes along. I too have never had an experience like this and am thankful I have PayPal's Buyer Protection to leverage.

To that end, I have initiated a PayPal dispute on this matter which I will escalate to a claim if a refund is not issued by you by 17:00 CDT.

Further, I'm undecided on whether to share this issue with Rev Devil, which would undoubtedly threaten your standing in BF.com just as a dispute as a seller will threaten your standing with PayPal.

I see two options for you:
1) Immediately issue a full refund, only after which I will return the knife to you
2) Ready yourself for a PayPal dispute

Lastly, I see no need for any further communication between us. If you refund the payment I will send you tracking info through PayPal. If I have not received notice that a refund has been processed, I will escalate the current dispute to a claim, of which I'm sure you would be notified by PayPal.

This has been a serious waste of my time and I refuse to sink anymore into it.

Good day."

On 5/29 @ 10:40 AM I get a notification from PayPal that Steven sent me the same amount I paid him (not a refund, a F&F payment), and that the dispute has been closed.

Steven to me on 5/29 @ 3:09 PM:
"OK Rex, you have your entire purchase price refunded and you have my knife. Let's see your integrity. If I get my knife back in a reasonable amount of time, upon receiving it in the same condition you received it , I will reimburse you for priority shipping and insurance."

(I don't reply)

Steven to me 5/29 @ 7:03PM:
"Ok you are the man, that should make you proud you f****d me and you are a man. Now give me my money that you owe me. I will contact IC3. gov internet forum you will be reviewed by the government."

Me to Steven 5/29 @ 7:29 PM:
"Steve,

Relax.

I told you no further communication was necessary and I meant it. I also told you exactly how this would progress should you refund my payment: I got a notification from PayPal that my money had been returned and right now your knife is packaged up, ready to go. Your insistence that the knife be shipped USPS means that I have to wait until tomorrow to ship rather than using FedEx or UPS, and I am following your request to the 'T'.

When I am able to make it to the USPS and get this out, I'll send you tracking info, just like I said I would.

Additionally, I will be posting this story, along with all of your ranting, incoherent and abusive communication on Bladeforum.com. My goal is that no one else has to deal with you ever again.

Lastly, and this is important: Your communication has crossed into harassment and I am requesting you do not contact me again, for any reason."

I've received my refund, sent the knife back as requested in a timely manner, and send Steven a PayPal invoice for $10 for shipping/insurance.

Steven to me 6/3 @ 6:40 PM:
"Please hold your breath until payment received, thank you."

I truly hope Steven sees this and responds, clearing this whole thing up for me and everyone else. Short of that, beware of this seller.

Last, many thanks to Lone_Wolfe for trading emails with me one this, helping me understand options and my responsibilities as a buyer.

Edited for language.
 
Last edited:
Here we go again..
Slighting or non FULL DISCLOSURE
or the one or the other side misrepresenting
This is becoming a true issue in BF
These bad deals or one or the other party
paying this way or not doing this or that..
Be an adult in how you handle your sales-trades
Carry yourself with character and integrity..
Im sincerely disappointed as a long time member..

================================
For The Selfless MODERATORS--Thank you all so very much
for all you do for each member in BF--The things you have to
monitor-put up with and tolerate..I cant imagine..
I for one thank you all.........
================================
 
How does a knife leave the seller described as "Never carried, used or sharpened", and "no marks on scales or blade" then arrive in the condition described by the buyer, especially when they both have good feedback, unless the seller means "Never carried, used or sharpened by me"?
 
All the obvious aside....that sure got spun out of control quickly from being a dispute over who pays the shipping costs to solve the issue, to what ended up happening.
 
As soon as you noticed he had purchased it used and then sold it as new, you should have held off. That he didn't want to recompense you for shipping (even though it was his fault) isn't surprising. People who aren't upfront about what they're selling generally have squeezing every dollar possible out of items and people as their top priority.
 
An epidemic of mental illness lately
""""""""""""""""LOVE THIS--So HITTING IT ON THE HEAD""""""""""""""""
 
This is not a judgment against you, R_P_C, or meant in any way to condone the seller's behavior, but in my experience, side-to-side blade play when a knife is partially open is a fairly normal phenomenon, even with folders that lock up like a stone.
 
I stopped reading right after this:

"A quick frame up: I saw this large CRK Carbon Fiber Insingo Sebenza for sale on the board and instantly wanted it, described as "Never carried, used or sharpened." Almost immediately Lone_Wolfe posts a reply to the OP which asked if the one listed by the OP is the same as another previously sold on the board (LW provides the link). The previously listed knife being described as "Knife is gently used." I click on LW's link and, sure enough, glock45 was the buyer."

"A red flag but I'm blinded by lust....."


If your desire or 'lust' over-rides your common sense, you will be starting a lot more of these threads in the GBU.
 
Last edited:
This is not a judgment against you, R_P_C, or meant in any way to condone the seller's behavior, but in my experience, side-to-side blade play when a knife is partially open is a fairly normal phenomenon, even with folders that lock up like a stone.

Do kinda agree. OP do you have proof that the knife was as your describing it? Also I can't believe the seller refunded you before getting the knife back. You could have easily commited theft. Not that I don't believe you just here it's always good to have proof. The previous seller before Glock45 saying it was very lightly used and no other issues would have meant their were two liars/scammers here. I can sympathize as have had a string of knives not as described lately. People really need to be better at describing the knives accurately if they don't want things returned, though everyone has a different opinion on "condition" but there are some things that absolutely should be disclosed on the condition in a sales thread. Way to many threads popping up in GBU.
 
Boy howdy. What a mess. Mistakes were made on both sides, the most egregious of course by the seller. But buyers need to take some responsibility in letting themselves get screwed. I mean, you bought the knife even though you knew the seller was lying about the condition and then were shocked by the condition. How does this even make sense? Sort of surprised you didn't use paypal gift as well. And a refund should not have been requested or made until the property was returned. This is buying and selling 101 folks.

Seems like I say this every other day but, two more for the ignore list.
 
A lot of good commentary from well-established members, which I truly appreciate.

I feel the need to clarify a few points though:
1) I truly didn't and still don't care about the return shipping expense not being reimbursed. Do I think the cost should have been the seller's responsibility? Yes. I sent the last invoice with nearly no confidence that it would be paid though. I simply did it to verify to myself that the seller was not a man of his word. He said very clearly that he would reimburse that cost if certain conditions were met, I met said conditions and he completely went back on his word, which leads me to point of clarification #2.

2) It was the seller's solid feedback rating and claim in the sell thread that, "Anyone that can find signs of use on this knife upon receiving it, I will gladly refund their purchase price." that were the reasons I felt confident buying despite the disparity in condition. I was buying the knife to put in my pocket and use, signs of "lightly used" would have been fine with me.

3) Whatever meter, tool or means of measurement I could have employed to more scientifically measure the blade play I experienced, I don't have. The blade literally wiggled in my hand. If I still had this thing I would send it to another one of you, or even CRK for validation. Even in my limited experience with CRK's products, a blade that can literally be swung ~1/8" left to right seemed undeasonable to me, and therefore hit on point #2- that I could fall back on the seller's pseudo-guarantee that, "Anyone that can find signs of use on this knife upon receiving it, I will gladly refund their purchase price." Which brings me to my final point.

4) I felt and still do that I had a legitimate concern and reasonable request to return the knife for purchase price. I commented that I felt he should cover the shipping cost but conceded to him that I would. Where this started to spin out of control is when the seller, out of nowhere, says that he will actually not be honoring the condition to refund purchase price from his original post and his initial response to me- that he would accect the return under the many conditions he listed.

This buy, as well and this GBU post (and possible subsequent roasting of me) is a learning opportunity that I hope will make me a better forum member in the end. That's it.
 
This is pretty cut and dry though even Paypal will tell you to return the item first before expecting a refund.

Next time maybe you should see the red flags for what they are . . .
 
NEVER assume merely by ones feedback.. Ones
misrepresentation or one persons view to another
what I see as close too new and another persons IS completely different

OF course a COMMON sense thing would be if your not certain of condition and you feel
you need additional pictures or even clarification..ASK.
Ask for as many pictures as you want..ASK for past references of others that have dealt with the
other person..ETC...

I NEVER buy or trade a knife from a person that just pastes the former owners thread.
OR a person that will not fully cooperate with any and all my questions and or pictures I require.
THOSE people have things too HIDE.......
THATS lazy an extremely wrong and in many ways deceptive.
If the OP balks to supply more pictures or a better description.
MOVE along..Make it clear in a email or pm..have a paper trail IF the knife is ""NOT AS DESCRIBED
I want a FULL REFUND""" That is a rule in here anyway..
Integrity---Character---Honesty----Take PEOPLE far in this community.,.
WE have seen so VERY many of these unnecessary threads in here for quite a bit now
THE Moderators do us all a FAVOR by helping keep this place safe..
Do your part as a member as well. Cover your A$%..and help others do the same

Hoping a quick resolve:thumbup:.
 
Last edited:
Do kinda agree. OP do you have proof that the knife was as your describing it? Also I can't believe the seller refunded you before getting the knife back. You could have easily commited theft. Not that I don't believe you just here it's always good to have proof. The previous seller before Glock45 saying it was very lightly used and no other issues would have meant their were two liars/scammers here. I can sympathize as have had a string of knives not as described lately. People really need to be better at describing the knives accurately if they don't want things returned, though everyone has a different opinion on "condition" but there are some things that absolutely should be disclosed on the condition in a sales thread. Way to many threads popping up in GBU.

This isn't necessarily true..The seller could have worked the knife over after owning it for a period.

This did escalate quickly..It's amazing how many of these threads we are seeing lately.

Couple of tips for buyers and sellers.

1) If you are going to have stipulations for returns, put them in your original sales post. This is being upfront and helps with any issues.
2) If you have a feeling about the sale for one reason or another, keep moving..There is a reason why you have this instinct. USE IT..At the very least, ask more questions and request more pics.


Hope this gets resolved.
 
As soon as you noticed he had purchased it used and then sold it as new, you should have held off. That he didn't want to recompense you for shipping (even though it was his fault) isn't surprising. People who aren't upfront about what they're selling generally have squeezing every dollar possible out of items and people as their top priority.

I'll give the OP the benefit of the doubt here, because the seller did post a guarantee to refund money if the buyer wasn't happy. At that point, I was even considering the knife. I figured I'd be getting a nearly new looking, gently used knife. The seller did me a favor by sending me a rude PM, calling me a "homeland Security Type", and something else I won't post.

I think the real issue here is the seller responding with thing like "After thinking about this, prove that I wanted to take advantage of you.. I did not enter in to this with the thought of screwing you. I will loose more than you unless you can prove I had planned on on it . Have a great day."
and ""Ok you are the man, that should make you proud you f****d me and you are a man. Now give me my money that you owe me. I will contact IC3. gov internet forum you will be reviewed by the government." Not sure what either was supposed to gain besides ill will between both parties.

As for getting the refund before returning the knife, the seller could have insisted the knife be returned first and paypal of course would have agreed. But either way, the seller got his knife back. However, once he said "If I get my knife back in a reasonable amount of time, upon receiving it in the same condition you received it , I will reimburse you for priority shipping and insurance.", he should have kept his word.
 
I dont agree with how the item was listed as new when it was purchased as gently used. That right there is a no brainer. Side to side blade play mixed with an off center blade though to me signifies a simple adjustment to the pivot could have corrected the issue. Still regardless of the errors the seller made I see a lot of mistakes being made by the purchaser. The biggest of which is a red flag being raised but you roll the dice anyways. That to me makes me thing both parties here are responsible for the outcome. And while you claim the return shipping is a non issue your actions say otherwise. The whole thing blew up over that return shipping and then citing other issues as justification. Then when emotions went hot now we play the "no you refund me first" game? As an outsider looking in two people made mistakes and mistakes are still being made. I think the easiest and best way to handle this is to send the knife back and get the refund. And maybe even apologize to each other for mountains out of mole hills. Even though the seller had some dishonesty, from what I see he made an honest attempt to rectify the situation and you didnt like those terms and it spun out. Now, you could say he should have paid the shipping considering he misrepresented but when you admit to knowing that prior to purchase you cant exactly keep that feather in your hat for a later bargaining chip. IMHO you forfeited that the second you let "lust" take over.
 
We need to keep the drama down, the amazed, shocked, and outraged members please stop posting more drama. I will just leave this here for your reading, you know who you are.
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/announcement.php?f=699&a=207
This isn't the preaching forum, nor is it the stir crap into a foam forum. If you are not directly involved check your posts before submitting, helping is good, drama is not going to cut it I'm 'fraid.
That said, the original poster needs to contact the other party involved and let them know this thread is here. Until then, we are closed for business.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top