You have gone from asking questions about the sebenza to making negative statements about CRKs. You seem to have an agenda here.
Not sure I said anything negative about CRK, as opposed to positive about TSF, but perhaps it would have been better as a question: if you are responsible for damage to a Sebenza (as opposed to some QC/warranty issue), is it easily and cheaply fixed? Is that better?
Honestly, I'm still unsure about whether I went the right way on the Sebenza vs. TSF Beast issue. But there does seem to be a difference in usability--most of the folks around here seem to treat the CRK as fragile, and are no liable to push the limits of the knife. Instead they say "use another knife". Well okay. But then why own the Sebenza, if a different knife is more versatile and useful?
No agenda. But hey, here's another question--would you use (okay, collectors can walk away, I'm talking about actually using the knife) a Sebenza in salt water situations? That is, would you wear it in your pocket while surf fishing? The TSF didn't hold up to that well, but my Strider PT hasn't had a problem, even full of sand and without being taken apart for cleaning for about 5 years. Often times there is a lot of talk about CRK's impressive machining tolerances, but are such close tolerances desirable to have in a tool you use?
Cheers,
Daniel