Today, many companies sell their names that their grandfathers made famous a half century or more in cthe past.
Just because a knife has "Randall" or "Wusthof," or "Henckels" stamped on the blade, doesn't necessarily make it a good "using knife".
Some folks consider a knife (or anything else) "high quality" if it's pretty, and well fit and finished, regardless of whether or not it's functional.
Forgive me if I didn't make my comments about 440 A&B more clear. For a knife that will be used for what a knife is normally intended for, (to cut things) IMHO, the steel and the tempering of that steel, are far more significant indicators of "quality" than the appearance, ergomonics or fit and finish.
As an example, I consider Bob Dozier's knives, of properly heat treated D-2 steel, as top quality. If Bob made the exact same line of knives from 440A/B or AUS-6/8, I would consider them "very low end" even though Bob made them.
I suppose I should have given my definition of "quality" from the beginning. In my value system, performance trumps appearance any day.