Yet another G-SHOCK thread.

Joined
Dec 17, 2005
Messages
7,809
OK, I need a watch that can take alot of abuse and I know G-SHOCKS are up to that part of the challenge but the real question is...... are they worth it? Do they live up to the hype or could I get something cheaper that would be just as good or better?

When I say alot of abuse I mean normal wear and tear along with alot of exposure to salt water and also some solvents, mostly degreasers, silicons, teflons, nothing really harsh. Quite a bit of my time is spent around injection molding tooling, which is notoriously hard on watches and jewlery so the rubber casing is extra appealing.

I like the looks of the Frogman, but I don't like the fact that you need to get it serviced by a cert. Casio repair shop. Are they all like that? Can anyone suggest a model that would meet my needs?

Thanks.
 
I have a G-Shock World Timer 3765 Silver edition. Paid about $100.00 for it. had it for about a year. I work in EMS and bounced it off alot of stuff with no problems. I love it.
 
I'm real hard on things like boots, belts, watches and the G-Shock is the only watch I've worn (that I can afford anyways) that I haven't broken in the course of my usual daily routine. For me, I say its well worth it.
 
Thanks guys, thats what I thought I would hear, just wanted to make sure.

Guess I'll start looking this weekend.
 
I love mine ,if cost is a important factor skip the world timer ones and just get the beefy black 1289 model. There is a camo version but it is more money.
The only thing I don't like is the strap.
 
I've had my DW003 for about 5 years now. Love it.

It is the model that the Baby G-Shocks are modelled after, with the metal guard on it to help protect the face.

I love this thing.

Just don't know where to get the battery changed out when it goes...:confused:
 
I wore Timex Ironman watches for several years and the G-Shock I have now is so much better it does not even compare. If you look around, you can find some good deals, some quite a bit less than $100.

Here is a link I found quite a while back on how to change the battery, I printed it out and filed it......um somewhere..

http://forums.watchuseek.com/showthread.php?t=19704
 
All the watch manufacturers tell you not to let anybody but an authorised dealer touch your watch. It's because there are watch butchers who sit in malls and butcher watches for an outrageous fee, and the manufacturers hate it when you send your watch back to them to fix what the watch butcher at the mall did.

You can do it yourself or take it to anyone who is not an idiot.
 
I wore Timex Ironman watches for several years and the G-Shock I have now is so much better it does not even compare.

Thats one of the things I was wondering about, my brother swears by the Ironman watches but they never really did anything for me. If they worked better though...

Cougar, I suspected as much but I have heard of divers watches that are oil filled to compensate for the pressures of deep water. Frogmans good to 200 meters so I just wasn't sure.
 
The reason that Casio tells you to take your watch to a certified repair shop, even for a simple battery change, is that in waterproof watches they renew the seals and then have to pressure test them.

Typically, here in the UK at least, this process costs about the same as replacing the watch with a new one; at least in the $50 range........

I discovered this to my cost when having the battery replaced in my DW290!
 
I had a metal band G-Shock (G-7100D). Problem is, the band attaches to plastic anchors via metal pins (which I presume is the ultimate connection point in most /all G-Shocks). After slightly less than two years, one of the metal pins managed to shear through one of the plastic anchors. I am not easy on watches, but I'm not the hardest either: I still have Timex watches that are fine after over a decade. So I was pretty put off by the failure, especially since I wasn't doing anything stressful at the time (I shut a door, at which point the watch fell off my wrist). I presume the failure had been the result of time.

I was pretty upset, but I was assured by friends that G-Shock would make good on the deal. I called up and spoke with someone who informed me that my watch was out of warranty (only one year) unless I had taken an online poll when I purchased it, in which case my watch would have still been considered under warranty. I asked if an exception could be made since I had never been aware of the online poll. No deal: it would cost $40 to repair a $100 watch.

I sent the watch in with a thoughtful note explaining my situation. I explained that I had come to respect G-Shock based on what I had heard from friends of all walks including police/military. I explained what I had been told on the phone: that my watch would have been covered under a technicality if I had been more aware. I said I was more than happy to discuss it more if anyone was interested.

Almost six weeks later, I got a computer generated letter in the mail. Obviously, no one had even looked at my letter. The letter proposed three options:
1. Pay the $40 for repair
2. Pay $15 (IIRC) to get my broken watch sent back to me with nothing done
3. Pay nothing and they keep my broken watch

Annoyed, and determined not to pay so much to get back a broken watch, I paid the repair fee, which I presumed would most likely be getting me a new watch.

A couple weeks later, I did get a new watch in the mail, but it was not the model of watch I had sent in. It was a watch worth slightly less, and with different features than I wanted. Furious, I called their customer service. The person I talked to said that my original watch was no longer made, and therefore they had sent something of similar value. I asked why I was never contacted about this. He claimed that I must have been, and that I would have been offered the chance to pick out a watch. No, I definitely would have remembered that. When the conversation kept going in circles like that, I ended it.

I called the next day, after my internet research showed that my original watch was not discontinued as a model, but only in the face color. They could have sent me my same watch in a different face color, but instead sent me something completely different. This time a rep told me the same lines as the first. I assured her I had been given no choice in the matter (not even on the lovely computer generated notice). She finally conceded that I could send in the wrong watch on my dime, and that I would be given a credit of XXX value. Problem was, XXX value was not enough to get me my original watch, just another of the wrong ones that was sent. When my brain started to melt, I finally hung up.

I stuck the watch in a drawer and tried to forget it ever existed. $40 to replace a broken watch that could have been covered under warranty, only to get a cheaper watch with the wrong features, all in the quick turnaround of almost 8 weeks. Thanks G-Shock!
:jerkit:
 
i paid about 80.00 for my g-shock. it has the 'tough solar' and 'wave ceptor'. never (shouldnt) need batteries and sets itself by the atomic clock in colorado.

i love it.
 
Here's a great place to browse/buy G-Shocks:

www.jomashop.com

I've bought several watches from them, they are really
a terrific dealer and they have a money back guarantee.
 
Casio, Inc. in NJ has a less than great reputation for repairs. But, there are other alternatives, such as the "un-official" Casio Sales and Service out of CA which has a good reputation.

There are many models with various construction techniques used. I like the titanium cased, screw-back models such as the Frogman series.

My 5600C was bought in '89 and is still running on the same battery, though the bezel fell apart due to heat and chemicals and the band has been replace twice for like reasons.
 
I bought my G-Shock DW-6100 exactly five years ago, and it hasn't failed me ONCE. It has no sealing problems, the face hasn't cracked (despite some really hard hits- and it only has one scratch on it), and they are just built like tanks. I really can't endorse G-Shock enough- they've far surpassed my expectations.
 
Deal is done, picked up a G-2500 last night. The shop I went to had sooooo many, it was hard to choose. By the time I walked away with this watch, my 4yo. was bouncing off the walls.

I overpaid, 60$ and found it online for 40. But I figure, after shipping and the like, I only paid 10 bucks to get it right away.

I really liked the OD green version's face color, its like an amber/gold but I always liked the red G-SHOCK on the bezel, and the OD version had off white lettering.

I'm happy.
 
Now that you've had it a couple of days, how do you like the face color?

I've been thinking of a Mudman G9000 with a similar color scheme.
 
Sorry, I think I worded that last post kinda poorly.

I ended up with the standard face color. If you like the look of the OD and amber Mudman, go for it. The only reason I went for the standard version was I liked the red logo, if it weren't for that, I'd be sporting the other one.
 
I've heard/read of legibility issues with the non-traditional color schemes.

The reverse faces (lighter numerals on a black background) seem to have the biggest issues.

Guess I'll keep investigating

Thanks for the feedback.
 
I am going to look for a G shock that is solar, atomic, and has analog hands, if it exists. Research time...
 
Back
Top