- Joined
- Dec 6, 2001
- Messages
- 59
On each Forum member's 'home' page, he has (i) his name spelled
and, under his name, something similar to: "Posts: 51" . That's what mine has.
I can't prove it, of course, but my intuition is:
no WAY no WAY IN THIS UNIVERSE have I posted 51 times. There's no way. It just can't be. You MUST be counting in the posts of:
Bizarro-world-J. D. Martin; or the android-JDMartin; or
JDMartin-in-an-alternative-universe. It can't be ME--NO WAY have I posted that many times. No freakin way! It's not a 'near' thing: if the Forum put me down for '25' posts, HALF (!) the Forum's current number, I would still protest the number was high--might even be TWICE the correct number. So we could be talking a TWO HUNDRED PERCENT OVERCOUNT!! THAT'S why the prepostrous number '51' currently listed caught my eye. It's WAYYYYYYY off.
The systematic 'high' counts perpetrated by the Forum, it has a purpose... I am not sure what yet, but it has to do with how they control people using tiny radios in their teeth
---- J. D. :barf:
and, under his name, something similar to: "Posts: 51" . That's what mine has.
I can't prove it, of course, but my intuition is:
no WAY no WAY IN THIS UNIVERSE have I posted 51 times. There's no way. It just can't be. You MUST be counting in the posts of:
Bizarro-world-J. D. Martin; or the android-JDMartin; or
JDMartin-in-an-alternative-universe. It can't be ME--NO WAY have I posted that many times. No freakin way! It's not a 'near' thing: if the Forum put me down for '25' posts, HALF (!) the Forum's current number, I would still protest the number was high--might even be TWICE the correct number. So we could be talking a TWO HUNDRED PERCENT OVERCOUNT!! THAT'S why the prepostrous number '51' currently listed caught my eye. It's WAYYYYYYY off.
The systematic 'high' counts perpetrated by the Forum, it has a purpose... I am not sure what yet, but it has to do with how they control people using tiny radios in their teeth
---- J. D. :barf: