jaegar said:
It's true, I haven't worked any 440. I also don't have a custom knife in 440. although I do believe that something custom made is better, factory isn't too far behind (if using 440 I believe. Also this refers to stock removal.)
Practically all of the knives that I have grown up with were 440. At least 4. My main complaint is that it doesnt hold an edge very long (and I do know how to sharpen. Very well I might add). The stainless properties are nice, but edge holding, it's just not all it's pumped up to be.
I'm sorry that you were offended by my post, if you re read it, you will notice I put a clause in saying that this is merely my opinion. I feel I am entitled to my opinion. Other makers have praised other steels. When I first had 440, I liked it, but that is because it was better than what I previously used. I have found that ATS 34 seems to out preform 440, along with AUS 6 and 8. (in the stainless steels)
~Brian
Most factory knives of more than a few years ago, if they were advertised as 440, were not 440C. That still holds true. If a factory actually uses 440C, and has it properly heat treated, they're proud of that fact, and would advertise it as such, not the generic term "440". That term can actually mean anything, because it means nothing. Their is no steel called "440" and a knife labeled as such could be anything.
There are three grades of it, 440A, 440B, and 440C. The latter being the best for blades(and about the only 440 used by custom makers), but the first two being easier on factory machines.
Not holding an edge either means 440A, B, or improperly heat treated 440C.
I use both 440C, and 01 in my shop knives, all were heat treated by the same person, Paul Bos, a professional heat treater to who many makers send their blades. I use them side by side, and a third of the 01 is worn down from use, and sharpening, the 440C is not nearly as worn, it just seems to wear better, and it holds it's edge as well, or better than the 01.
It's not the miracle steel of the ages, but it's far from junk.
There's one big time knife company back in the south east that until recently made their stainless blades from 440B.
I wouldn't use that steel if you gave it to me, and paid me to use it, but their knives command a premium on the secondary market, and I've not seen any complaints about it, at least openly.
I wasn't offended by your post, just saddened. You ran down a steel that many custom makers use to make a living, and did so without showing any proof of why. Many people wil read it, and assume it's true, and that's not right.
Like I stated above, and elsewhere, most problems with any good stainless steel used in knives can be traced to heat treat problems.
Edited to add; Fox, sorry, I didn't see your prior post on this subject.
And jaeger, because you didn't like a knife you say was 440C still does not mean that 440C is bad. There could be a hundred reasons the knife didn't perform like you wanted, most likely poor HT, and/or poor edge geometry.