- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
- Messages
- 2,018
Another aspect of CASE's approach to stag, is that it doesn't really feel like stag in the hand:grumpy: It may be to do with their source of stag or the way they smooth it down, I don't know, but most of stag knives I've handled FEEL very different from bone. A slight porous texture to it-it is after all more akin to hair than bone
I actually prefer their Bonestag 6.5 scales to their stag! Got a Mini Copperlock in stag that seen spine on looks like a snake that's just swallowed a mealGreat bulge in the middle and narrow each end. If you look at one of Wellington's latest pics in the Sheffield Golden age thread you can see some extraordinary gnarled grooved stag that is also thin on the handle, magnificent .But that is from long ago when either stag was better or the cutters were more skilled.
GEC's stag is in all ways superior but CASE bone is often superb.
It is probably a little of both. The stag may have been better as there was no embargo on India Stag as there is today. As well, "back when" scales were fitted to the knife by grinding away at the back of the scale to leave the bark intact. As you can see on the Case examples, Case cutlers fit the scales to the knife, then grind all the bark away from the ends so that the scales "match" the bolsters. GEC does a much better job at fitting the scales, leaving only a small bald spot as a result of fitting. They must spend a lot more time fitting the scales to the knives prior to the final finishing... Even their knives with end caps only have minor balding due to fitting. Case also seems to do some finishing on the surface of the stag as well. Unfortunately, that finishing removes much of the character that those of us that love stag are looking for.