No, I am saying that the fact that there is a single bevel grind would not exclude it from such consideration which should be obvious because all the cheap utility knives have that exact grind.
Single bevel edges are very thick because they lack a primary grind, the thickness is essentially the full knife stock. The bevels are essentially formed from low sabre primary grinds and thus about 10 degrees or so is standard. I EDC knives which are both far more acute and thinner than any of Emerson's knives.
A. G. Russell's Deerhunter which many will carry as an EDC knife has an edge of about 0.010" thick and ground at about ten degrees per side. Many of the newer Spyderco's with high flat grinds are coming in at similar profiles. Measure the thickness and angle of your single grind emerson and see if it is significantly more acute in profile.
I leave mine as filed but you can polish it up to 0.5 micron if you want. How can you possible contend that adding a primary grind to the knife which is more acute than the existing edge bevel on a single bevle grind reduces the cutting ability of the knife? This should be obviously absurd which means that the single bevel knife has a lower than optimal cutting ability. It is used simply because it is cheap and that is why it is the grind found on $0.25 disposable utility blades.
-Cliff