ZT 0200 or ZT 0300

Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
24
I am looking at getting a new folder and I have been looking at the ZT 0200 and 0300 recently. Only problem is, I can't decide which one. I am kind of leaning towards the 0200 because of price, but I am trying to decide if the 0300 might be worth the extra cash. There are the obvious differences between them; materials lock type and some differences in shape, but I am also wondering if there are differences in fit and finish as well as lock up and durability? If anyone can comment if they have owned either or both of these that would be great! Thanks in advance for the info!

-Jake
 
Own both, for me the 0200 feels better due to handle shape. Both are solid feel like tanks. Either way you can't go wrong. If it's a price issue go for 0200. If you have preference to liner lock of frame lock that could help decide. Also one is manual and the other assisted opening. sorry guess i'm not much help since i did get both.
 
Hi Jake, and welcome aboard! I've had both and much prefer the ZT0200. But I am a little biased as I do not like the titanium/G-10 construction method, even though Kershaw does put a steel liner behind the G-10. This is why I have hardly looked at the Hinderer, Strider, ZT0550/0560, and other's of this ilk. Please don't misunderstand me as I am not saying that this is an inferior method of construction, it is simply a personal thing with me.

But back to the thread. The fit and finish of the ZT0200 is spot on! It has the feel of a custom in your hand, especially with those sculpted G-10 handle scales. I've had about a 1/2 dozen of these since they became available ( sold and traded a few) and now have 2 of them. The lockup has been excellent on all of them. Those hardened steel liners are .080" thick and lock up solid against the .157" thick blade tang. The hardened steel is actually harder than titanium and you will not get as much lock wear. Of course as thick as the lockbar is on the ZT0300 series, I don't think you are going to have to worry about any wear on it either.

Far as blade steel goes, it is 154CM for the 200, and S30V for the 300. While 154CM is an older steel there are many folks on the forums that like and appreciate it's ability to take a fine edge, hold it for a very reasonable time, and then sharpen up really easy (with the right equipment).

I've always thought that the ZT0200 was one of those knives that is really a super value for what you get vs. what you pay. There are other knives out there constructed from the same materials for higher prices than the ZT.

Bottom line is that I do not think you will go wrong with either one of these knives! Pick one and enjoy it.
 
I have both as well...I carry the 0200 daily ...good steel,good grip and it pierces better than the 0300.....get em both if you can cos theyre great knives...FES
 
thanks for the info guys!! I am still kinda on the fence, and have found a few other folders in the price range that i am thinking about so my decision is even harder, although I suppose I could have bigger problems than deciding between which high quality folder I am going to buy next. I might pre-order the 0561 and I am also liking the DPx HEST 2.0 and the lion steel sr1. Any opinions on those compared to the 0300 and 0200? I really like the HEST, but it looks like some people who have reviewed it have found blade play.
 
I have both and prefer the 0300 for EDC. The 0200 does feel better in the hand though. You can't go wrong with either one and as other posters have said, the Bladeforums answer is buy both!

Here's a pic with the 0200 and 0300 beside other for a size comparison.

4431025352_0ef82bb817_o.jpg
 
ZT200

  • Less Expensive
  • Lighter/Easier to Carry
  • Manual Open
  • Lighter Duty Lock, Although Still Stout
  • Only One Choice in Color

ZT300

  • More Expensive
  • Heavier/Harder to Carry
  • Assisted Open
  • Heavier Duty Lock
  • Several Color Choice for Handle & "Tiger Stripes"
 
Back
Top