- Joined
- Sep 5, 2006
- Messages
- 20,593
What hardness did ZT take the B75P, used with the 0600 to?
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I never really got the "overbuilt" thing either, to tell the truth.
Solidly built? Sure, absolutely.
Overbuilt...what would that even mean?
"Well, we're done making this knife."
"Hell no, keep building it!!!"
.
Removing weight for the show side won't help, you'll have to do it from the made and the ti side. At that point it's best to just trade it for something else.
What hardness did ZT take the B75P, used with the 0600 to?
Anyone know who has any gen3 550s in stock?
ZT's customer service is the only thing keeping me from turning completely away from them. None of their knives are really designed to be high performance. Good steels are only really good if the heat treat is just as good and if the blade thickness and grind matches the intended purpose. Caged bearings only stay interesting for so long. 3d machined titanium is the only they do that I can find unique and designed for actual high performance. The rest is basically marketing hype. So customer service and 3d machined handles. Personally, I'm tired of their tactics of introducing a knife 2 years before it's released and then only having a couple hundred available in order to increase the profit margins to ridiculous levels. When I could get one of their top tier mass production knives for about 200 bucks, they were far more interesting. That seems to be a thing of of the past.
I was looking forward so much to the 0180 but after some serious thinking about what they do with steels and how they grind them, they could have used 1095 and accomplished the same thing as the current steel they're using. I mean hell, they put out S110V at 58-59 hrc? WTH? Optimally hardened vanadis 4e is about 63 hrc and can be taken significantly higher and still retain toughness comparable to A2. That's an outstanding combination. I will bet they didn't take it above 59. They might as well have used cpm D2 or something much cheaper.
To me, it's about marketing hype for people who care more about bragging rights than real users who want the highest performance out of a production knife. I've learned that I need to look elsewhere, and I've found what I've been looking for in another company. I still take out my remaining ZT, the 0561, and play with it a little, but I usually end up asking myself why I still have it. It doesn't whittle, doesn't slice, the bearings get jammed up. It's built for "tough use" but I'm afraid to actually use it hard because I'm sure it'll break. The emperor wears no clothes.
Been waiting since June for my 0562CF, and since it has not yet arrived I bought a standard 0562 when Amazon informed me they were available. Got it yesterday and I can't say I'm as thrilled as I hope to be.
To be sure, the knife looks good, and has no issues. Perfect centering, fast flipper, freakishly sharp. But it just doesn't feel right as an EDC, and I think it's a combination of the weight and the balance. My usual EDC's weigh a tad under 4 oz, while the 0562 weighs a solid 5.5 oz (155 grams). And you can feel it. Plus the weight seems to be biased towards the blade, so the balance feels awkward.
My grail knife is a Spydie Stretch CF, and it weighs 110 grams. Another knife I compare it to is my Griptilian 550HG with Putman scales (about 115 grams). So all three knives have 3.5" blades, yet the 0562 is bigger/heavier for the same blade. Pics below.
[/IMG]![]()
You can see that the 0562 is massive in comparison to the others. The handle is larger, and the blade is both bigger and thicker. I guess it will just need some time to get used to it, but while I envisioned the "ultimate" slicer EDC, I really feel the 0562 is better suited for more rugged tasks (which elude me at this time). Maybe cutting rope, making tent stakes, self defense, etc. For slicing tasks---such as cutting boxes, stripping wine bottle cellophanes, eating food---the 0562 blade seems just too thick & heavy.
I am contemplating grinding the false edge off the blade to lower the weight, and possibly skeletizing the scales if I can figure out how to remove them. Anyone else have some thought on this?
I think you need a Paramilitary or an Opinel...
Honestly, just look at every other zt, they're frickin' tanks! What made you think the 0562 would be a slicer?
Personally, I like a thicker blade. I don't do any "slicing" where thickness affects cutting performance.
I've never understood the whole "slicer" thing unless you mostly just cut cardboard and paper, maybe food.
Even food, why? I've never needed my knife to cut food unless I was looking for a reason to use my fancy knife.
My ZT 0560CF is a beautifully made knife that handles like a dream. I love it. It has extraordinary fit and finish. But it never gets any pocket time because the fat blade grind is so low performance. EDC's have a do a a lot of jobs, and for me that includes a lot of detail work. The 0560 is a poor knife for high-performance, detail cutting.
So when ZT said the 0562 was going to be a slicer, I was hopeful that maybe ZT would have an EDC that is not overly gaudy and is focused on high performance. Not to be. Just more meaningless marketing.
There is no reason why a heavy-duty EDC cannot also be a high-performance cutter.
Anyone know who has any gen3 550s in stock?
Hi exmaxima,
I built a rough model of the 0562 blade profile for my own engineering research. I was trying to predict blade geometry effects on cg location and performance. What I did to quickly help you out is cut out the top swedge to show you approximately how much weight you would be saving by removing it: it's only 8.96 grams, with original weight to be 73.74g, and after swedge removal 64.78g.
My conclusion is that you can not remove the 120g you are seeking since the blade has the most mass and opportunity to remove mass. I used the elmax density of 7.81 g/cc, conversely the ti is ~4.50 g/cc, which means its less opportunity to remove weight.
Much appreciated info! I have used Autocad, but your modeling is far more advanced. To be honest, I like the revised blade shape, and still might do it. If I add a choil and trim away some of the flipper tang, I may lose a few more grams as well---it all adds up..
Thanks again!