- Joined
- Oct 10, 2010
- Messages
- 284
Hey all,
not sure if this question has been posted before. I've seen a lot of ZT200 vs ZT301 threads, but I was wondering if its possible to compare the 301 with the out of production MUDD. Besides the difference in blade steels, could both be considered equal in terms of lockup and toughness?
I have read some accounts of the MUDD getting some bladeplay, while others reporting putting it through arduous paces and maintaining tight lockup.
On the other hand, I don't recall anyone ever experiencing bladeplay with the 301.
I know that a good framelock is tough to beat, and the 301 seems to spot a great one. Although I can't say I'm familiar with the MUDD hawk lock system.
Aesthetics wise, I think the 301 wins here. But like I said I don't seem to recall seeing any comparisons between these two so I'd like to hear feedback from members who own (or have owned) both.
Thanks in advance!
not sure if this question has been posted before. I've seen a lot of ZT200 vs ZT301 threads, but I was wondering if its possible to compare the 301 with the out of production MUDD. Besides the difference in blade steels, could both be considered equal in terms of lockup and toughness?
I have read some accounts of the MUDD getting some bladeplay, while others reporting putting it through arduous paces and maintaining tight lockup.
On the other hand, I don't recall anyone ever experiencing bladeplay with the 301.
I know that a good framelock is tough to beat, and the 301 seems to spot a great one. Although I can't say I'm familiar with the MUDD hawk lock system.
Aesthetics wise, I think the 301 wins here. But like I said I don't seem to recall seeing any comparisons between these two so I'd like to hear feedback from members who own (or have owned) both.
Thanks in advance!