I will never understand why people buy a knife with tolerances like a CRK then go ahead and start sanding down surfaces that move against one another.
As far as I can tell the knife is designed to break in and get smoother over time with use.
I don't either, but usually do not find that I am going to influence the decisions that people want to make concerning what they do with the things they buy.
My purity has been sullied..
Because we all don't buy a sebenza 21 for the water smooth opening. I could care less about this hydrolic kind of action, that's not what I find the most attractive in this particular knife. I really like its looks, its simplicity (compared to my "pain in the ass to maintain" Chaparral), the metal used (the fact that it's reported as easy to sharpen, is also a plus), the blade shape, the way the scale are washed (better than a Sage 2 or a ZT imo) and I won't pass on it just because of the kind of action it has. Now, the best of both world - for me - would be a seb 21 who could actually flick, hence why the thread. It doesn't seem that hard to understand, is it ? We all have different incentive to buy a Sebenza 21, some are buying it for the action, some are buying it for the nice piece of knife history it represents, some for the design, collection etc. I'm not interested in it for its particular action it has and if I can tweak it to fit my taste, I will.
It's like people who bring a Satin finish and rework the Nirvana Spyderco blade a little to make it FFG. Is this also a crime or are people that defensive only when it comes to Sebenza and CRK ? Am I the first who want to mod a knife a little ?
Again, these are not custom knives. Please stop calling them as such.
ApostleP
OP, buy what you want and do what you want with it, but do your research before hand to find out what you are doing. I wouldn't trust reddit for advice. Do not sand or strop the washers or anything internally. Let the knife break in before you immediatly turn around and become disappointed or send it back. It seems that if they are so rare where you live that if you are not happy with it after a while you can turn around and sell it for likely not much of a loss. I can flick my Large 21 open just fine but I only do it to use it. Sounds like you have plenty of fidget knives already. A CRK is much more of a using or collecting knife than a flipping toy. I'd suggest purchasing as such.
Again, who said I'll only use it as a flipping toy ? Because that's what you're suggesting (you and the guy before who told me to buy a fidget spinner). I use every of my knife daily, I just happen to flick them a lot between uses. I don't really get why is it so hard to understand to some people that you can actually be a flicker kind of knife enthousiast and still use the knife often. Are those two things mutually exclusive ?
I don't collect knife myself, I just rotate the ones I own, but I won't judge people who do so.
I'll take the advice of let the knife break-in before attacking the washers.
The op seems to be looking for only one answer to his question. That being if it’s not the answer he’s looking for offense is taken. There has been numerous answers to his question from some knowledgeable members. As of people being mean nah we know that’s nots what’s going on here op. Your question has been answered a few times as we have all read. Now with that your only looking to hear they are great flippers as you stated the are perfect other then they aren’t really a flipping knife. So again can you flip them with effort yes, are they designed to be a flipper know, agian all this has been said to you. Seems weird new account 2 threads started both seeming to start a little controversy not a lot but just enough and then reading your responses here make ya wonder.
Someone asked if you could flick a sebenza 21 and that's "controversy" to you ? Screams defensive insecurity to me.
I accept both "yes" and "no" answers, which is actually the purpose of the thread, as long as it goes with an explanation so we can sort the thruth out, because as you can see, there's a lot of conflicting reports in this same thread (like I said in my first post).
The worst things is, there have been a lot of interesting answers, but thanks to the paternalist answers of some, it's hard to get the point now.
Last edited: