111 Classic

David Martin

David Martin

Moderator
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
19,520
With the recent posts and interest on a lighter 110 I wanted to show the original light 110.
The 111 Classic. Here is a photo of one beside the Bass Pro 110. DM
If this doesn't work, then I don't know how.
raw
 
Last edited:
Doesn't seem to be working, Dave.

Are you using that Chinese photo posting site?
Think I saw some rice.

:)
 
The photos show on my PC.
The width difference I'm trying to show is 3/16", between the two. The Bass Pro being wider.
Which creates a different heft and feel. I think the different 'feel' is real. I think some are into a lighter, thinner knife and this will appeal to many. DM
 
Last edited:
The weight difference may be small 2.5-3 oz.. But this trend has returned from the 80's and is in vogue again. Fashions and styles do that. They come back for another run. I think we should listen. DM
 
Well, getting photos to show on your PC is a start.

The trick is to show them on the forum.......sometimes that's difficult.
 
This must be the one you're talking about.
Feels kinda light and weak, though........wouldn't want to have to try to kill a griz with this one.
:D

beEPuev.jpg
 
If you're wanting to show the difference in width......here it is with an old 112 and a new-fangled 110.
Quite a difference.
DteS13i.jpg
 
Your's is a different year model than mine but (82-?) close for our example. For some of the older models it could be 3/16"-7/32" wider.
Pretty, yes. The stamping could be dropped and still fill the criteria for this era. I think it may hold up as good or better than a plastic frame. Duty level aside. I'm thinking this call/ desire should be heard and we ride it out. While satisfying the wants toward a modern looking 110. It's nothing new. If Buck did it 27+ years ago they could do another run this year. See how it is accepted and drop it if sales don't mete out. Hey, the Copper & Clad model could be used as a test run. There you have some data.? DM
 
20170819_145541.jpg
David Martin said:
With the recent posts and interest on a lighter 110 I wanted to show the original light 110.
The 111 Classic. Here is a photo of one beside the Bass Pro 110. DM
If this doesn't work, then I don't know how.
raw
Click to expand...
if you email them to me Sir, ill put them up for you. i understand if youd rather not.

edit part uploaded Mr. Martins picture of his 111.

beautiful knife and example of a 111, Sir. sure wish buck would do a run of these again. with a pocket clip though.:)
 
Last edited:
You say yours has a 3 dot blade... Ok. But yours doesn't not have 'Buck' in fancy script lettering between the two rear stainless pins.
This was dropped early on. They did some experimental items with these models and press plates and the plates would wear out. And
they made little changes to the design (engraving pattern). Mine holds a 3 dot mirror polished blade as well.
Still, where I was going is, Buck brought these designs out long before a thin, light 110 came into vogue. I'm sure aluminum strength has changed some since 81. They could have a more plain handle w/ a pocket clip like jb desires and still be very light. Glad Copper & Clad did it
with micarta and wood handles. I see an opportunity here. DM
 
View attachment 752536 View attachment 752537 Here is picture that David helped me post showing the weight in ounces of some of the 110 variations. The second shot has some 111's with blade variations. The Aluminum in the 111 is dead soft because the "engraving" is embossed in a drop hammer, but it is very adequate to anchor a pocket clip in a tapped hole. Those coining dies may need some refurbishment. Just do not throw the thing in your pocket with change. Actually they come with a tooled leather belt sheath that matches the "engraving".
 
Tiguy, thanks for placing your good photo in this discussion. As it contributes the weight of these various modified models. And shows where
this can be taken. Yes, if they weren't 'engraved' harder/ stronger aluminum could be used. Thus, more resistant to scratches and holding pocket clip screws better. The pocket clip may not interest me but I can see the function and why folks like them. DM
 
View attachment 752559
David Martin said:
Tiguy, thanks for placing your good photo in this discussion. As it contributes the weight of these various modified models. And shows where
this can be taken. Yes, if they weren't 'engraved' harder/ stronger aluminum could be used. Thus, more resistant to scratches and holding pocket clip screws better. The pocket clip may not interest me but I can see the function and why folks like them. DM
Click to expand...

The pocket clips will never fail on a 111 because the holes are deep and there are 3 of them. The aluminum is a little smeary, so it helps to use taps and dies made for soft Aluminum. The middle knife in the first picture above has a skinnied up Titanium handle (3/8" thick). You will notice that the weight is improved.
Another way to lighten a handle without reducing thickness is to 3-D print it. Buck has a 3-D printer, but it does not do Titanium.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top