2 Dot 110 question...........

I sent Richard a email and invited him to come back and discuss this some more so I hope he will.

Here is another question about 2 dot 110 production in the 70's "was it relatively linear production?"

There was aproximately 6 full years of two dot 110 production. During that time four different inlay/rivet patterns were used. And this if examples of those four variations:
DSC_1259.jpg


As a practical matter the 4 inlay rivet knife doesn't count in this discussion as it was just an effort to use the existing inventory to 2 rivet inlay during the transition to a three rivet pattern and its production numbers were not significant.

1978 If it is correct that three pin two dot production began early in this year with small head rivets and that somewhere in the remaining two years of two dot production, the transition to large head rivets was made...ONLY 1/3rd of two dot production was of the 3 pin variety. Consquently, there would have been approximately four years of two pin production and two years of three pin production. (I'm assuming linear production through this period. It was August of 1980 before Buck moved into the new huge facility...what production blips happened with the move?? Maybe two dot production continued until this facility move was made??). If there was in fact linear production over the six year, we collectors should see an abundance of two pin two dotters; after all, a majority or 2/3rds of production would have been two pin two dot production.

What I've found to be the case during my collecting effort were numerous two pin pre-dot 5th versions while relatively few of the two pin two dots. I also found the small head 3 pins to be hard to find but not uncommon. My main point is that the two dot collecting opportunities are overwhelmingly large head three pin knives. Yes they are the most recent but we are only talking about a range of a few years immediately prior to Buck moving into their new big production facility in August 1980.

Again assuming a reasonably linear production rate for 110s, I concluded that a majority of the 3 pin production was of the large head variety and that the majority of two dot production was 3 pin production. Therefore barring dramatic variances in production it is a reasonable assumption to think three pin production began around 1975. Interestingly 1975 is a date commonly used quite often when people want to date the two dot knives.

So prior to this discussion and dating from Richard and support by David M., I had theorized/assumed the following:
1974 - Two Dot production begins with 2 pined inlay.
1974-1975 - Transition to 3 pined inlay (w/the brief 4 pin prod.)
1975 - Small Head 3 pined production
1976 - Transition to large head 3 pin production

I'm not saying this is right. I am saying that it seemed reasonable to me based on availability of variations on the collecting market.

And all this don’t means squat if Richard or Joe or CJ or someone else says I was there and 3 pins started in 1978.

Also, this was fun laying my thoughts out on paper this morning.
 
Last edited:
Flat,Thanks for letting us see and shape your thoughts.Just glad you didn't do it during Miller time.I'll not quote you as its lengthy but I agree w/ most every thing you said.I think you did a typo in the paragraph just before your date line par.."three DOT production began around 1975".Perhaps should be three pin production? Your beganing to think like a Buck collector.ie. adding in made up reasoning when real data is lacking.But it fits the fashion Buck uses.Bearing this in mind I've wondered if the 3 dots were nothing more than Buck indicating the move into the EL Cajon plant and subsequent change in their heat treating process adding the cryogenic soak.Perhaps Paul Boss could prove me in error.Because what I've read it was a change of the rocker material.Well, what does that really mean?The pin,the lock bar?They still look the same! Good discussion.DM
 
Thanks David...that was supposed to be pins in that sentence.

So Paul's new HT and cryogenic soak began with the move into the new El Cajon facility. That makes perfect sense.

Were there any significant capacity upgrades in the mid and late 70s? I can't find anything to suggest a production spike. I'm still trying to get at the idea that production was relatively stable or growing slightly since my theory won't hold water if say 110 production spiked 5 fold in 1978. Maybe it did happen exactly that way because that's what seems necessary for 1978 to be the first year of 3 pin production.

So I'm still looking for a comment about the production rates for 110 over those years.

I do have to say that only someone that really likes Buck knives could possibly be interested in this discussion:eek::eek::eek: Geez I think I'm bored today. I should go put some Ironwood on that 500 that lost it's buffalo scales.
 
Flat,Production didn't/couldn't spike.As 440C was being used. Which only allowed something like 1000-1100 blades to be made in a day.A determining factor.Whereas, 425M allowed around 5000 to be fine blanked(a term needing defining)in a day.Then 420HC allowed something like 10,000 in a day.This was the tail wagging the dog as well as some other factors.ie. recieving Macassar Ebony on time, getting the kinks worked out inorder to expedite production, ect..You can't move ahead unless you make the adjustments to meet demand.Having done this Buck could then sieze a market share w/
the advantage of a large production facility.DM
 
DM,

I always believed that production was linear...thanks for pointing out that 70's production was most likely maximized due to contraints working with 440c. Well that just keeps me dubious of 1978 being the year for 3 pin production.

Since I'm asking questions and focused on this time frame, one wonders if the move to 425M was made almost immediate after starting production in the new facility in 1980. After all it was the new blanking equipment not liking 440c that caused Buck's change to 425m. It would be logical that the new blanking equipment was installed as part of the new facility's original design and layout. I doubt all that money was spent just to centralize operations...it was to increase productivity and production opportunities. It's widely believed/held that 425m usage began in 1981 but maybe it was before.

Not that it matters except in dating a knife and understanding what was used to make it.
 
Flat,I think your on track.The cutlery market climate was different then than now.A bright future was on the horizon and growth at hand.Buck moved with the wave.
I'm sure they had a change of steel in mind going into the new larger facility.Probably many changes in mind as I've heard some stories.Leroy or Paul B. can fill you in on just when Buck began experimenting w/ 425M.But I'm sure it was atleast in 1980.
Good discussion.I'll stay tuned.DM
 
See Dave knows something about this and is just sitting back and giggling. You dirty dog:thumbup:
OPPS! emergency crawfish .. all back 1&2/3 i nweeds more power scotty!....

i no-thin
kno-ting a talls!
jester squiting ands watching der binking lights...
 
Last edited:
This issue has been around for many years on this Forum. Joe Houser, Larry Oden and I have been researching this for about 15 years. We have sales receipts, warranty papers, brochures and first hand accounts which put the transition from the two pin to the four pin to the three pin design in the 1978 time frame. This has been further confirmed by the construction of the Aurum Game scene knives (all three pin) which we know is a 1978 project. In Joe's list of 110/112 variations he does not pin down the date because of his conservative nature but I know based on the knives I have in my collection that 1978 is the year.

In putting this issue to bed, particularly when using assumed production volumes we have to keep in mind the state of the economy at the time, the popularity of Buck knives at the time and the rate that knives are consumed (scrapped) over time. I believe Buck went to the three pin design because the two pin design was not holding up well in the field. This, along with the growing popularity of Buck knives could explain the lack of two pin knives available to collectors.

I should not have said "through about 1980" but should have said "to about 1980" on the end date for the two dot.

I appreciate being identified as a former Buck employee but I have never worked for Buck. I have just been collecting and researching Buck knives for a long time. I have had the good fortune to have known and talked extensively with Vern Taylor, Leroy Remer, Larry Oden and Joe Houser as well as many other Buck collectors. All that research is starting to paint a picture of buck knife production. The two dot two pin to three pin transition is one of those pictures that is fairly clear. Take care.

PS: I have ebony inlayed 110's both plain and FG that have almost blond inlays in them. I assume the Segua(SP?) inlays would have been used up long before the subject knife was made. Note that the grain structure of both inlays is the same. This would not be the case with a different species of wood on one side of the knife.
 
Last edited:
Richard,Thank you very much for taking the time to clarify this topic.I'm so glad there are knowledgeable collectors in this forum named above who are willing to share with us what they have researched.Thanks for your time.DM
 
OK fellas, just to many of you saying 1978 the year of the 3 pin.
I'm still not sold. Maybe I'll comment some more as I'm working on some additional thoughts...not sure though as the really important info (steel, inlay material, frame styles) are known.
 
Well I've been told that Larry and Richard ARE the authority on this issue.

So if you guys don't mind, one more question and then I'm done nit picking this issue: What are you guy's opinion on why there seems to be greater availability of the pre-dot three line knives as compared to the two dot two pin knives. I have yet to be able to find a 112 2dot2pin...I just have the gut feel that they are rare and the reason was limited production time?

Thanks for the back and forth everybody, its been a most enjoyable discussion. g
 
Based on my informal observations of the availabliity of Buck knives to the collector, I would say it is mostly the ebb and flow of the current market coupled with the strength of the economy at the time the knives were sold and the strength of the effectiveness of the sales activity back then. Existing inventory at that time plays a role as well. If there was a big push on three liners just prior to the introduction of the two dot two pin that could explain a lot in terms of availablity or lack there of. We should keep in mind that most knives back then were sold from counter top displays at independent sporting goods stores. The knives just didn't turn over as fast back then. This time frame also predates the big chains like Cabela's, Bass Pro, Wally World, K Mart, Dick's, etc. Further, collecting was just getting started and Buck was just getting known outside the Southwest. That is my best guess.

I appreciate your theory on the two pin to three pin transition but we have to go beyond plausible explinations and get to what the available data tells us. I would be happy to entertain another date if I had the facts to back it up. Take care and keep turning those rocks over.
 
Thanks Richard for that last explanation.
Interesting you've mentioned the old hardware store display era of old.
I'm thinking of have a look around at some of the old Mom and Pop hardware stores in the area and checking their knife displays. Maine culture has been resistent to big box retail (although the hold outs are loosing the battle) so this state still has lots of small towns with the little hardware store and even a few old display knives that date back quite a number of years. Nothing as old as the Dots but now and again you can run into something interesting. g
 
I don't know if I should open this up again but we say "small pin" and "large pin" in differentiating the evolution of the three pin design. I talked with Leroy yesterday and we think the actual rivet diameter has not changed. What appears to have changed is that the "small pin" versions have their rivet heads partially machined off in finishing the inlay whereas the "large pin" designs have their inlays finished prior to the addition of the inlay pins. Thus, the inlay pins in the "large pin" versions have the full rivet head exposed making it appear that the pins are larger but instead the real difference may be the finishing process on the inlays. We know that this process change occured in 1978 but not before some "small pin" three pin knives were made. FYI.
 
112 Photos for your digestion.....I swear on the stack the pictures are all of the same knives. See how the rivets change perspective from angle of photo........ 300Bucks

112Radiusclose.jpg

112rivetsize.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top