Will Power
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2007
- Messages
- 33,742
There has to be some suspicion as archaeology has become such a 'loaded' discipline- used to confirm or underline current accepted theories or indeed, prejudices. There's a lot of money involved too with regard to funding further excavations/research and the notoriously inflated yet brittle ego and 'reputation' of academics. Piltdown Man....
Experts on bronze, metallurgists, will know more about the properties of corrosion of this metal in the ground. It may well endure very well in certain dry soils. However, the sword and the arrow heads were allegedly buried with a corpse and the decomposition and acids of a rotting body would surely have had an impact on them? But perhaps not. It's an interesting find yet worth pondering over.
Experts on bronze, metallurgists, will know more about the properties of corrosion of this metal in the ground. It may well endure very well in certain dry soils. However, the sword and the arrow heads were allegedly buried with a corpse and the decomposition and acids of a rotting body would surely have had an impact on them? But perhaps not. It's an interesting find yet worth pondering over.