3v HRC Debacle

The simple fact they changed It?
This is the world when even when people are wrong they will die before admitting. And it Is beautifull.
 
Last edited:
Hahaha get your link with your hands I am not.wasting my time.

Read the post: on Instagram they confirmed they are running new batches at higher HR. Stop. It Is on their Instagram. Stop.

3V at 55 was a joke.stop
 
Hahaha get your link with your hands I am not.wasting my time.

Read the post: on Instagram they confirmed they are running new batches at higher HR. Stop. It Is on their Instagram. Stop.

3V at 55 was a joke.stop
So you cannot provide a link to back up your statement that benchmade said they didn't do this on purpose. Got it.

Good to know that people still make up stuff on the internet in 2020!
 
Fyi in Instagram they said they fixed the HT.

So for the They Did It On Purpouse guys...no.

Anybody willing to try?? :)
You see, the problem with your statement is that they did it on purpose AND they have now changed it.

Good companies change things all the time. Take spyderco with their cqi as an example.

Don't be in such a hurry to be right and miss the obvious.
 
I have zero cares for you not Reading what I already told you. So you can go on with your provide a link story. Go on their Instagram,read, reply. I leave you ti your undefendable position.
 
You see, the problem with your statement is that they did it on purpose AND they have now changed it.

Good companies change things all the time. Take spyderco with their cqi as an example.

Don't be in such a hurry to be right and miss the obvious.

No no.your gettint It All wrong. Maybe I was not clear.

I dont think benchmade made It at 55 on purpouse.or Better: I do believe they either did It to save money on grinding or they Did It for incapacity.

But there were people saying they did It on purpouse at 55 which Is....Amazing and incredible.

I am super Happy they are now running It where It makes sense to run It. 55 Is butter.

And that they improoved. Hope my position Is clear.
 
No no.your gettint It All wrong. Maybe I was not clear.

I dont think benchmade made It at 55 on purpouse.or Better: I do believe they either did It to save money on grinding or they Did It for incapacity.

But there were people saying they did It on purpouse at 55 which Is....Amazing and incredible.

I am super Happy they are now running It where It makes sense to run It. 55 Is butter.

And that they improoved. Hope my position Is clear.
I get that English is not your first language (you are from Italy) but no, you are not clear and you are now contradicting yourself, even using words that don't make sense. Maybe time to stop.

Further, your first post in this thread today was to rub it in the face of people who believe benchmade when they said they ran the steel soft on purpose. That's just rude. Then when questioned to provide evidence you refused and acted more rude. Like I said, maybe time to stop.

If they are running it higher, that is a good thing imo. Maybe buy one and give us a review.
 
craytab craytab I was genuinely curious, so I went and found the comment he's talking about. Sounds like CQI to me. They released something, customers complained, and they updated it.

VW4iLj0.png

hGw9Hv0.png
 
craytab craytab I was genuinely curious, so I went and found the comment he's talking about. Sounds like CQI to me. They released something, customers complained, and they updated it.

VW4iLj0.png

hGw9Hv0.png
Thank you for the evidence. Honestly, my questions to him were rhetorical.
 
I dont care if you think I was rude. Happy somebody brought you your precious evidence! Happy not to have wasted my time providing It to your rethorical questions. And so much amazed by how you can think you are close to have any reason to defend your position.

Open your eyes: It Is ok to complain against a very disappointing HT. Nobody is perfect.

But defending it.ahahhaha cmon. And saying "oh It Is rude to Say you were right!" .

Grow.up.
 
Last edited:
Little history: I asked some time ago IF they fixed the HT for this.

Somebody replied: there Is nothing to fix this Is like this on purpouse!

Later on: benchmade fixes HT.

Today: I said: Guess what???they Fixed It!

And than...the link guy appears. The evidence guy.
Go on...keep the meaningless and shamefull discussion Alive.

Truth of the story Is Benchmade now finally Is producing a maybe good 3v. That Is good. Well done Benchmade. This Is good. But maybe Crytab bought 250000 bailout knives @55 HRC and they are melting.

Anyway this Is a two people discussion and if you want we can continue private. Too much oot.
 
Last edited:
Little history: I asked some time ago IF they fixed the HT for this.

Somebody replied: there Is nothing to fix this Is like this on purpouse!

Later on: benchmade fixes HT.

Today: I said: Guess what???they Fixed It!

And than...the link guy appears. The evidence guy.
Go on...keep the meaningless and shamefull discussion Alive.

Truth of the story Is Benchmade now finally Is producing a maybe good 3v. That Is good. Well done Benchmade. This Is good.
Revisionist history. You forgot when you inaccurately and rudely said this:
So for the They Did It On Purpouse guys...no.
You are wrong. Sorry.

Notice I'm only disagreeing with things you are clearly wrong and being rude about.

And with that, I'm done responding to you about this. Enjoy your evening, or whatever time it is in Italy!
 
So let me say that I support companies putting out knives that the advertised heat treat matches the actual heat treat. With m390 and 20cv we're being told it's run higher and it's testing lower. Benchmade never mislead anyone with their 3v heat treat. They intentionally ran it low in an attempt to make it tougher. This did not optimize the steel and the community knew they wanted a higher heat treat. Benchmade made the change.

To me there was no foul play. They had an idea for heat treat, it didn't work, and they changed it. Spyderco does this and gets praised. Sometimes design and execution don't work as you thought it would.

Now, advertising a higher heat treat and it actually being lower is an issue that needs to be resolved.
 
So let me say that I support companies putting out knives that the advertised heat treat matches the actual heat treat. With m390 and 20cv we're being told it's run higher and it's testing lower. Benchmade never mislead anyone with their 3v heat treat. They intentionally ran it low in an attempt to make it tougher. This did not optimize the steel and the community knew they wanted a higher heat treat. Benchmade made the change.

To me there was no foul play. They had an idea for heat treat, it didn't work, and they changed it. Spyderco does this and gets praised. Sometimes design and execution don't work as you thought it would.

Now, advertising a higher heat treat and it actually being lower is an issue that needs to be resolved.
Exactly. Why this is so difficult to understand and be so wrong in the process, I don't get.
 
So let me say that I support companies putting out knives that the advertised heat treat matches the actual heat treat. With m390 and 20cv we're being told it's run higher and it's testing lower. Benchmade never mislead anyone with their 3v heat treat. They intentionally ran it low in an attempt to make it tougher. This did not optimize the steel and the community knew they wanted a higher heat treat. Benchmade made the change.

To me there was no foul play. They had an idea for heat treat, it didn't work, and they changed it. Spyderco does this and gets praised. Sometimes design and execution don't work as you thought it would.

Now, advertising a higher heat treat and it actually being lower is an issue that needs to be resolved.

This is very true. The double standard is strong here when it comes to companies doing product improvements.
 
Back
Top