OK, Architect, let's start... I am aware that we all operate on different levels of perfection but I'll try to elaborate my oppinion.
First, about the integration thing. It's a feature most spydies have, and IMO it's a clear sign of a higher level of refinement. Let's take two knives, say an Emerson Karambit (whick is a pretty good knife at an unpretty price) and a Spyderco Calypso jr. (which is a discontinued, reliable and affordable knife). Look at both knives in open position. They have smooth curves, and continuous shapes from the handles to the tip of the blade. They are nice. Now close the knives and look again. The Calypso jr. keeps those continuous lines while the Karambit "breaks" the whole aesthetics with his back of the blade protruding near the pivot pin. It's a minor thing, you'll say, but the point is that Spyderco achieved it. I picked the Calypso jr. on purpose, as it's a pretty old model. Practically all newer knives made by Spyderco are looking good open and closed as well. Spyderco did it a long time ago, remember the Pegassus, Navigator, Meerkat, Native, Renegade ... and the list goes on.
Now the ergonomics. With all do respect, this knife has bad ergonomics. First, the lock looks pretty hard to operate, especially if you have meaty fingers (and freshly clipped nails)

. Second, looks like when you open the knife, your thumb may hit the bolster. The hole is too close to the pivot pin. But what I dislike most is the lack of even the smallest sign of a finger choil or guard. You can easily cut your finger if your hand slides a bit forward.
I didn't say that flat grinds, bolsters and linerlocks are obsolete, I say just that them alone don't justify a custom collaboration. A custom collaboration, IMO is based upon the art to mix all those ingredients and make something good. And different. And that concludes my pleed. :grumpy: