The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I'm quite impressed with the steel actually...it took almost zero edge damage from beadblasting and stonewashing, it felt quite hard on my diamond stones with minimal burring that was easily removed, and took a WICKED edge easily. As far as the "plastic" handle...doesn't bother me in the slightestI'm surprised that you think AUS-10A steel and plastic handles for $150 is a phenomenal value.
Have an MG AD20, and a 20.5 on the way...can't wait to compare them! If I like it enough, may sell the MG and get the sharksfoot 20.5.
That's good. It looks like an awesome lock mechanism with really fidgety action but by the materials it seems like a $50 knife with a $100 locking mechanism. I guess fidget factor is worth a lot these days and the most important part is that you're happy with it. I just wish it at least had slightly better steel and G10 handles for the price point.I'm quite impressed with the steel actually...it took almost zero edge damage from beadblasting and stonewashing, it felt quite hard on my diamond stones with minimal burring that was easily removed, and took a WICKED edge easily. As far as the "plastic" handle...doesn't bother me in the slightest![]()
As much as I love and admire AD's designs , I'd have trouble paying $150 for this level of materials .I'm surprised that you think AUS-10A steel and plastic handles for $150 is a phenomenal value.
That s what I ve been thinking.I'm surprised that you think AUS-10A steel and plastic handles for $150 is a phenomenal value.
Also, you only get one knife, not 20 and a half of them, so this is clearly a poor product!Sorry to derail this, I know I shouldn't, am I the only one who knows that sharks do not have feet, but fins? So the blade should not be called a sharkfoot.
It was originally called the “clasper blade” but that name didn’t turn out too popular for some reason.Sorry to derail this, I know I shouldn't, am I the only one who knows that sharks do not have feet, but fins? So the blade should not be called a sharkfoot.
There's full steel liners nested in the FRN slabs...it's rock solid.I will be interested to see how it holds up in a cutting test. Any blade play develop at all after a lot of tough use. I know Andrew did his homework so I probably already know the answer. Kevin