KnifeHead
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2006
- Messages
- 5,575
I have to admit that when I first starting reading the article starting on page 68 in the current(June) issue of Knives Illustrated, I flipped back to the front cover to make sure it wasn't the April 1st Edition. The article is titled: Aging Steel: Testing Reveals the Older Some Knives Are, the Better They Cut.
The assertion by the writer is that some knives that he tested 1-4 years earlier were now cutting 3 to 10 times better....because they have "aged". Sharpening was done with a Lansky system to establish the same edge geometry on all knives tested and similar rope was used for the cutting test.
I don't doubt that he was able to cut more rope 1-4 years later but, the last time I looked into it, extreme temperatures were needed to change the properties of steel. I'm astounded that an article like this gets into a magazine such as KI but I am novice...who the heck am I to judge an expert(I'm assuming this and you know what that does
)
Am I the big goof here for not believing this line of reasoning? I am willing to to be re-educated though, so what's your thoughts.
The assertion by the writer is that some knives that he tested 1-4 years earlier were now cutting 3 to 10 times better....because they have "aged". Sharpening was done with a Lansky system to establish the same edge geometry on all knives tested and similar rope was used for the cutting test.
I don't doubt that he was able to cut more rope 1-4 years later but, the last time I looked into it, extreme temperatures were needed to change the properties of steel. I'm astounded that an article like this gets into a magazine such as KI but I am novice...who the heck am I to judge an expert(I'm assuming this and you know what that does
Am I the big goof here for not believing this line of reasoning? I am willing to to be re-educated though, so what's your thoughts.