STR said:
I felt that you had to know that D2 steel ground that thin and at that Rc hardness would snap ...
I did it with a very similar tipped blade in D2 in the same review which didn't break, it isn't a "tactical" knife either.
I also really think you have a vastly different idea of what happened, it was shallow penetration in a piece of soft wood, not digging an arrow head out of a piece of seasoned oak. It is times like this I wish I had mpegs.
Plus this is a tactical/utility knife, you are really pushing limits here. If I did that with the potato peeler Alvin made you would have an arguement as I can see it not being reasonable to think anyone would think to do that with a 1/16" hollow ground blade, full distal taper on full hard 1095, especially with the way Alvin describes the performance.
So in that case you could argue that it was kind of a waste of time. However if I actually did that with Alvin's knife he would not get upset, and it certainly would not generate this type of reaction on rec.knives. He actually made a knife just like that for Swaim years back who in doing a review of *stainless* fillet knives did a corrosion soak on them and chucked Alvin's custom 1095 blade in and let it sit and rust for comparison. Alvin's responce was positive.
But this isn't the case here, yes you are familar with D2, yes so are a lot of people, not everyone is so informed, with this or other steels, so yes I do a lot of things that a lot of people will find obvious, not everyone has your level of experience, plus I don't think the label precludes it. Yes it might be meaningless to you, but it implies lots of things to lots of people.
What is your actual issue? In the review right after it is done it says that if you want to do significant tip work this isn't likely the knife and that if you have to do such carving you should cut rather than pry. This seems to be exactly what you are arguing in the above.
It doesn't go on a big rant about how this describes horrible performance. It is in fact only one small segment of the review. What you and Razorback have done in fact is highlighted this, shining a huge spot light on that one small detail. The constant rehashing, in fact you have done it in more than one thread, keeps raising the search engine link popularity, is this really what you wanted to achieve.
Instead of being a comment in the middle of the review, which somone would have had to read through the rest of it to find, you have taken it out and gave it pretty much a full thread all on its own on the highest indexed website for knives.
I know guys that have broken the tips of their D2 knives from Bob, from Knives of Alaska and other makers using this steel just trying to stick them into a log or rough sawn table top while they were using it so they could free both hands up temporarily.
Unless there is a significant distal taper which leads the main body of the blade to bend and thus break that looks like a problem with the steel. Yes D2 has a low impact toughness, but it should not be that brittle. I have used a lot of it, and have stabbed it into concrete let alone wood :
http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/knives/deerhunters.html
The Deerhunter certainly isn't an overbuilt pry bar either.
and :
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=322561
Razorback - Knives said:
Cliff, why don't you post pics of you doing your testing.
If you don't believe I am doing what I say a picture should not convince you. I could cut a pile of rope, chop a pile of wood with knife etc., and then take another knife and do a series of staged "action" shots. I could even do really misrepresentative vids with not much more effort.
As for "believing" me, I really don't care. I don't write the reviews to convince you or anyone else of anything. There are done primarily for two reasons, first of all I am curious and second people ask me, makers and users and I don't mind as it is work I enjoy doing.
Of course the fact that in the nearly 200 reviews, not *one*, maker or manufacturer has ever contested the work done sort of makes a statement.
Nakano 2 said:
...when and by what means did you speak with Bob Dozier where he stated the Agent model was made for "tactical/ utility" use?
Email, his responce was on 25 of June, 2004.
brownshoe said:
...did not believe that he "dry-labbed" his tests.
I worked with four blades from Ray Kirk when I didn't know the steels or the heat treatment until AFTER the work was done. I did the review totally blind of how the results should come out. I did this with no hesitation because I have confidence in what I do.
Plus note that in all the vague comments about faking there are no actual statements of specific contestation, no one with a GAURANTEE of different performance, yes that is the way to have an informative conversation about knife performance.
KnifeAddictAK said:
Why would anyone break want to break a second knife in the same manner as the first one?
Quality control check both on the knife and method.
-Cliff