- Joined
- Dec 21, 2006
- Messages
- 3,158
I've been curious as to how one might approach the heat treat for the Blue #2 steel, as far as how the steel is when received vs grain size. Should I go through the usual normalize/thermal cycling as we do on 52100 and other steels, or should I just austenitize as is? It is Hitachi steel, after all. Made by naked virgins under the first blood moon, as the flames rise from the compass's cardinal points, quenched in sacred oil, anointed with ashes, etc. Fold, burn, centralize.
I made two test samples out of the 1/8" steel. Scored them to help when I try to break them. One was just austenitized at 1490F for 10 minutes into room temp Parks 50. The other received the following treatment: 1600F, 5 minutes, air cool. 1500F, 5 minutes, air cool. 1425F, 5 minutes, air cool. 1490F, 10 minutes, room temp Parks 50.
Both samples were harder to break than I thought. The normalized sample might have been slightly easier to break. Both samples did not break on my score line, but elsewhere after several good wacks. But the grain size of both samples was like that of a file...or better. There was visibly no difference in the grain size between the two samples. Maybe microscopically....maybe not. They looked identical, and a very smooth light gray silky surface.
So as far as heat treating this steel....it looks to be good to go as is. I don't think I will bother with the cycling on this stuff. Was going to take photos and post them....but honestly you couldn't tell the difference. And we know what really fine grain looks like....so.....
I made two test samples out of the 1/8" steel. Scored them to help when I try to break them. One was just austenitized at 1490F for 10 minutes into room temp Parks 50. The other received the following treatment: 1600F, 5 minutes, air cool. 1500F, 5 minutes, air cool. 1425F, 5 minutes, air cool. 1490F, 10 minutes, room temp Parks 50.
Both samples were harder to break than I thought. The normalized sample might have been slightly easier to break. Both samples did not break on my score line, but elsewhere after several good wacks. But the grain size of both samples was like that of a file...or better. There was visibly no difference in the grain size between the two samples. Maybe microscopically....maybe not. They looked identical, and a very smooth light gray silky surface.
So as far as heat treating this steel....it looks to be good to go as is. I don't think I will bother with the cycling on this stuff. Was going to take photos and post them....but honestly you couldn't tell the difference. And we know what really fine grain looks like....so.....
