The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
What amuses me about your victim-shaming filled post is that you're so blind to the fact that the OP only questioned this guy's credibility after Alex had shown he had none.
Oh, but no, let's go on some hyperbole filled BS rant like " Alex's response was very, very tame considering that your previous email was disrespectful, accusatory and totally unnacceptable on any level."
Your eyes are brown, friend.
Artist can have mental health issues. Its what makes a lot of them creative geniuses yet socially not capable of being very good communicators. This also makes them less than good business people. Probably why a lot of artist put their work in galleries. To deal with the public and put on a business face can be dam near impossible. I read it on the forum all the time. Its a shame a guy with so much talent would behave this way. I have heard people say if I had his talent or his brain I would be succesful. Yea right. You would be in the same boat. There are artistic and talented people who can manage to be descent if not right great at business, but I assure you it comes at some price. So I would just suggest when you are dealing with someone who is very talented and you want them to do work for you. Try and understand. They aren't trying to be bad at business. It may just be part of the curse that comes with being what you like about them.
So next time someone says there is no excuse. Well there actually might be.
being critical of them will get you no where but frustrated. They still need business but they dam near starve sometimes trying to deal.
Just my 2 cents on why artistically talented people might seem like they don't give a crap.
My post dealt with the OP's accusation, not with Alex's business practices nor justifying them. And no........the first volley (and the most premature and unjustifiable one) came from the OP, unless you're reading into it something not there. So, your opening statement is self serving, wrong and unjustifiable.
If anyone, be it a customer or otherwise, inferred that you were potentially a 'thief' (especially when there was still a full 2 weeks left before the stated completion date), would you just suck it up without responding in some way? Hell, you can't even discern the intent of my post enough to not get all worked up and then respond hastily in a self serving rant. Seems your fuse is fairly short, if there at all.
You show me where I advocate for Alex to continue with the way he has dealt with this particular situation. In fact, I state clearly that my post had all to do with the inference of 'thievery', nothing else. That's what, "My comments don't go to Alex's business practices" and "Alex certainly could have kept you in the loop better" and "I hope that Alex comes through for you ASAP" is all about. You also show me where I am wrong in assuming that each and everyone of us would simply roll over and take such a comment as, "frankly, wondering if I'll ever see my knife again right now" without taking that as a accusatory and blatantly provocative statement. Given your above post, I'm absolutely sure that you wouldn't, nor would I expect you to, nor anyone else for that matter. That would also include Alex.....wouldn't it...? So yes......given that the OP voluntarily made that statement, "Alex's response was very, very tame considering.........".
You can try to justify the OP's premature and accusatory statement any way you'd like, change the words around or whatever, but they still come out as 'fightin' words' when all is said and done. That was the intent of my post and if you can't comprehend that, even though the above examples I've offered should be clear enough even for you, then your eyes are totally useless.......friend.
Artist can have mental health issues. Its what makes a lot of them creative geniuses yet socially not capable of being very good communicators. This also makes them less than good business people. Probably why a lot of artist put their work in galleries. To deal with the public and put on a business face can be dam near impossible. I read it on the forum all the time. Its a shame a guy with so much talent would behave this way. I have heard people say if I had his talent or his brain I would be succesful. Yea right. You would be in the same boat. There are artistic and talented people who can manage to be descent if not right great at business, but I assure you it comes at some price. So I would just suggest when you are dealing with someone who is very talented and you want them to do work for you. Try and understand. They aren't trying to be bad at business. It may just be part of the curse that comes with being what you like about them.
So next time someone says there is no excuse. Well there actually might be.
being critical of them will get you no where but frustrated. They still need business but they dam near starve sometimes trying to deal.
Just my 2 cents on why artistically talented people might seem like they don't give a crap.
James
besthaticando, it may be the best he can do too. I envy Alex can put himself out there like he does with his talent. He probably needs help managing his business, but i am not making excuses for him. I don't know of him at all. Just from this thread. Some artist are braggarts and they open themselves up to criticism. other stay in their shells and never hear any praises. they can seem very stubborn but its self preservation. To them.
In a perfect world, every knife maker/modifier would be able to enlist the help of someone with a business management degree. Unfortunately the reality is that these people probably do not make nearly enough money to be paying someone else a salary, and the only way to make more money is to keep taking in orders, which perpetuates this whole vicious cycle. As a whole, the "full time knife modifier" thing seems to be pretty much unsustainable. I don't think we've seen anyone do this for more than a few years before imploding/quitting/making their own knives.
The easiest thing would probably be for Alex to give up on everyone's orders, return their money and knives, and start fresh making only his own knives (which is his intention). It would be a much quicker end to this headache for everyone, although I suppose a bit less agreeable. Cuz damn, I really wanted that Po' Boy Roadhouse![]()
My post dealt with the OP's accusation, not with Alex's business practices nor justifying them. And no........the first volley (and the most premature and unjustifiable one) came from the OP, unless you're reading into it something not there. So, your opening statement is self serving, wrong and unjustifiable.
If anyone, be it a customer or otherwise, inferred that you were potentially a 'thief' (especially when there was still a full 2 weeks left before the stated completion date), would you just suck it up without responding in some way? Hell, you can't even discern the intent of my post enough to not get all worked up and then respond hastily in a self serving rant. Seems your fuse is fairly short, if there at all.
You show me where I advocate for Alex to continue with the way he has dealt with this particular situation. In fact, I state clearly that my post had all to do with the inference of 'thievery', nothing else. That's what, "My comments don't go to Alex's business practices" and "Alex certainly could have kept you in the loop better" and "I hope that Alex comes through for you ASAP" is all about. You also show me where I am wrong in assuming that each and everyone of us would simply roll over and take such a comment as, "frankly, wondering if I'll ever see my knife again right now" without taking that as a accusatory and blatantly provocative statement. Given your above post, I'm absolutely sure that you wouldn't, nor would I expect you to, nor anyone else for that matter. That would also include Alex.....wouldn't it...? So yes......given that the OP voluntarily made that statement, "Alex's response was very, very tame considering.........".
You can try to justify the OP's premature and accusatory statement any way you'd like, change the words around or whatever, but they still come out as 'fightin' words' when all is said and done. That was the intent of my post and if you can't comprehend that, even though the above examples I've offered should be clear enough even for you, then your eyes are totally useless.......friend.
There was no fighting words.
10 days before I got a response, I guess you glanced over the fact it was my 3rd email to him asking status. All of which had gone ignored. Seems a little suspect that he was fast to respond when he wanted me to pay but not when he was doing the work. So it was 100% justifiable. His response was not tame, it should have never ever gotten to that point.
10 days, think about that. 3 emails had been ignored. 3. THREE. The first one never should have been ignored.
I understand your point. However, I had emailed twice before politely asking and got completely blown off. 3 emails in 10 days is not excessive. I work 2 jobs, I field somewhere in the neighborhood of 250-350 emails a day. Every single one is read and attended to, some need nothing. A customer asking for status is something that needs attending to. Especially on the 2nd email. It should never get to a third email. A third email means you're being ignored, especially in the span of 10 days. It was not like I was emailing every 2-3 hours.
If your job is answering e-mails, yeah it's important for you to attend to e-mails, but comparing whatever you're doing that you get 350 e-mails a day (44 e-mails an hour??) to what a sole proprietor does is apples and oranges. When your primary means of correspondence with customers is e-mail and the work cycle is several months, and a client sends 3 e-mails in 10 days with the last one taking a clear jab at the guy's integrity before you even get a chance to respond to the first one, yes that is a bit excessive. It's shows a lack of confidence in their ability to manage their time unless the matter is urgent, and who is to say that if it was urgent you wouldn't have gotten a response immediately? Everyone runs their business differently, and there are a lot of people that put a low priority on status e-mails, and work them at designated times, but answer new business inquiries and address work that is on the table in a more timely manner. Your first e-mail no doubt showed up in his inbox, and you don't have any proof that he wouldn't have answered that 1 e-mail in the same timeframe he responded to 3 - except that he was quicker to respond to new business inquiries previously.
Nobody is defending this guy's actions in taking your money and not performing the promised work, and missing a half dozen deadlines - but you might want to consider that more than one person is telling you that your initial response was questionable in this context, and leads people to believe that you might not be a model customer. It's clear now he lacks integrity, but it wasn't that clear initially.
As for giving the seller a pass because "Artists might have mental health issues or coping problems", that is worse than citing "personal issues". I don't know where you guys come up with some of this stuff. It's the seller's responsibility to produce the products he took money for in the timeframe he quoted. If he's unable to deal with the public then it's his burden to enlist help or quit advertising services that require public contact. You see this on the forums all the time because the barrier for entry into this industry is low, and when there is a low barrier of entry it doesn't take as much integrity to build up enough business to create a facade of a good reputation. People that have the ability to produce (you have to make yourself work when you own a business, nobody else will do it for you) will thrive, and people that are lazy or just want to get by will end up as one of these feedback threads. It has more to do with the fact that he's not producing product than how he deals with the public. If he did the work he agreed on he wouldn't have to deal with the public.
Quiet ,
Alex is obviously not the best businessman , I doubt he would argue that he is. Nobody that is providing a service wants to create difficulties for themselves. That would be stupid. There are people with talent you could show them a million dollars and it won't change their practices. Not everyone is created out of the same mold. I hate to say the greatest artist because I think that would infer they could manage other apsects. I will say the greatest talents are sometimes NUTS
Alex is not hear to defend himself and I imagine he has a defense. Which may only work for him. Its may be who he is. Criticizing him may get the opposite results. Even if its justifiable critique. Its frustrating to people who don't understand.
look in the capitalistic scheme of things. Alex will pay for his practices. I hope he finds his path of least resistance with the most gain. heck he is trying its just not perfect. That perfection seems to be in the work he does. force him to do otherwise may get bad results. Literally bad things to help cope. Since his abilities to escape aren't available anymore.
OK I am done. I am only speaking for myself and not anyone else. I know how a screwed up mind works. It isn't pretty.
force him to do otherwise may get bad results. Literally bad things to help cope. Since his abilities to escape aren't available anymore.