- Joined
- Aug 7, 2003
- Messages
- 3,330
Don't let James Kim's Saab fool you. It was the derisively nicknamed Saabaru.
One could argue that the bad decisionmaking has been long on display.
http://www.azcentral.com/class/marketplace/cars/0612wheels12saabintro.html
When you overpay for badge reengineering, there isn't much left over for baubles.
I disagree with Bulgron all of the time, but this isn't a liberal/conservative post, especially since folks of all stripes like to outsource personal responsibility, some to the Gubmint and some to God.
Had I intended a political taint to this thread, I'd have posted it in the Political Arena.
My larger point for putting it into Wilderness & Survival is because it was here that we all tracked the story and because Spencer Kim's response is telling of a mentality, not specifically grounded in liberals, (Sarah Brady was a Republican), that seeks a governmental response to a tragedy because they cannot accept that sometimes bad things happen to the undeserving and sometimes people do get everything they have coming to them.
Knock it off on the politically snide commentary and engage Spencer Kim's article on its merits or lack thereof. It's folks like Spencer Kim who'd get the wilderness locked off as too dangerous for anybody and then where would we be? I'd rather have liberal allies against Spencer Kim's position than people I have needlessly offended with a label who might have otherwise found common cause against such overweening claptrap.
One could argue that the bad decisionmaking has been long on display.
http://www.azcentral.com/class/marketplace/cars/0612wheels12saabintro.html
When you overpay for badge reengineering, there isn't much left over for baubles.
I disagree with Bulgron all of the time, but this isn't a liberal/conservative post, especially since folks of all stripes like to outsource personal responsibility, some to the Gubmint and some to God.
Had I intended a political taint to this thread, I'd have posted it in the Political Arena.
My larger point for putting it into Wilderness & Survival is because it was here that we all tracked the story and because Spencer Kim's response is telling of a mentality, not specifically grounded in liberals, (Sarah Brady was a Republican), that seeks a governmental response to a tragedy because they cannot accept that sometimes bad things happen to the undeserving and sometimes people do get everything they have coming to them.
Knock it off on the politically snide commentary and engage Spencer Kim's article on its merits or lack thereof. It's folks like Spencer Kim who'd get the wilderness locked off as too dangerous for anybody and then where would we be? I'd rather have liberal allies against Spencer Kim's position than people I have needlessly offended with a label who might have otherwise found common cause against such overweening claptrap.