The whole reason for Damascus is to give the blade superior stain resistance.
It's my understanding that damascus was originally developed to utilized expensive, high-hardness steel in conjunction with cheaper, softer steel, even plain iron, to exploit the advantages of both. (hardness/sharpness and toughness). I doubt very much that stain-resistance was a big factor a few hundred years ago.
I gave facts. You do not accept them. Fact: Steel has molecules. I was told steel has none. Why should i accept anything from someone if they will not accept anything from me?
Because what you are offering as "facts" is a large steamy load of nonsense, perhaps?
A laminate is not the same as a weld, nor is a plating the same as a laminate. If the three were the same, it would take no skill at all to stack up layers of sheet stock with epoxy in between and make a "damascus" blade. Chrome electroplated to steel or aluminum, in a high-temperature, highly-stressed environment such as an engine cylinder, is certainly not the same as two or 200 layers of relatively similar alloys forge-welded together, even if every other layer is nickel.
Oil protects steel from the elements, it doesn't "degrade" steel or "delaminate" it. With all due respect, sog, you need to do some research rather than relying on hearsay that you "know" is right.
If I had never picked up or shown interest in a piece of steel before reading this thread, I'd know who to believe. People who reason out their points of view, with corroborating information... or one person who declares "facts" with no back-up at all... easy to figure out.