My brief comments on U2 and some photos with WHK & CRK.
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3951567#post3951567
I started with William Henry, but I love my CRK just because I can take it apart to clean it. So I do not need to feel restricted in how I will use my knife (including cutting a steak with my Sebenza when my plastic take-out fork broke).
WHK is slim, light, very gentle-man/woman. Classy and very nice design & action. They are my first knives as a newbie. I did not feel intimidated with them at all. To me, the initial impression was WOW!! Pretty & nice knife.
But then I discovered CRK Small Sebenza Micarta.
A little heavier, but definitely a work knife.
Then the Mnandi came and it's a whole new ball game.
To me, the Mnandi is the nice subtle well-made knife.
It is the ultimate knife marrying the sleek-factor of WHK with the work-ethics of CRK.
It is not as glamorous as WHK but I am confident to use it any way I like it with no inhibitions.
The wood on CRK is thicker than WHK.
CRK is inlay and WHK is onlay for scales.
My $0.02.
U2 is nice but definitely in a different class. But I think for the quality of U2, you are really getting a lot for the $$ on the nice sharp blade if it is all that matters. I do not care for the zytel handle too much.